Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs WBVRX
SSGSX vs WBVRX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs WBVRX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.54
Change-$0.45 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.49B
William Blair Small Cap Value R6
Price$29.23
Change-$0.40 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
SSGSX vs WBVRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. WBVRX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Hold and WBVRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.49B vs. WBVRX (1.07B). WBVRX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: WBVRX (0.99) vs SSGSX (0.48). SSGSX was incepted earlier than WBVRX: SSGSX (27 years) vs WBVRX (4 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than WBVRX (0.79). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WBVRX (35.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBVRX: SSGSX (2500) vs WBVRX (1000000). WBVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.86 vs. SSGSX (-3.68). WBVRX return over 5 years is better than : 156.09 vs. SSGSX (20.58).
| SSGSX | WBVRX | SSGSX / WBVRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.79 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.79 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.206 | 0.101 | 1,190% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.49B | 1.07B | 513% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.99 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.68 | -1.86 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.50 | 9.39 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.58 | 156.09 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement