Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs WBVRX
SSGSX vs WBVRX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs WBVRX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.37
Change-$0.09 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.96B
William Blair Small Cap Value R6
Price$28.54
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets878.09M
SSGSX vs WBVRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. WBVRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Hold and WBVRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.96B vs. WBVRX (878M). WBVRX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: WBVRX (1.00) vs SSGSX (0.49). SSGSX was incepted earlier than WBVRX: SSGSX (27 years) vs WBVRX (4 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than WBVRX (0.79). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WBVRX (35.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBVRX: SSGSX (2500) vs WBVRX (1000000). WBVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.73 vs. SSGSX (-13.94). WBVRX return over 5 years is better than : 124.19 vs. SSGSX (2.50).
| SSGSX | WBVRX | SSGSX / WBVRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.79 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.79 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.243 | -3.581 | 118% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.96B | 878M | 565% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.00 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.94 | -9.73 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.31 | -6.44 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.50 | 124.19 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement