Ad is loading...
SSILF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
WINH
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 30 closing price
Ad is loading...

SSILF vs WINH

Header iconSSILF vs WINH Comparison
Open Charts SSILF vs WINHBanner chart's image
Sa Sa International Holdings
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
Willcox International Holdings
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$12.5K
CapitalizationN/A
SSILF vs WINH Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SSILF vs. WINH commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSILF is a Hold and WINH is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (SSILF: $0.14 vs. WINH: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: SSILF and WINH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SSILF: 4% vs. WINH: 100%
Market capitalization -- SSILF: $565.14M vs. WINH: $7.5M
SSILF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $565.14M. WINH’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $7.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SSILF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWINH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SSILF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WINH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SSILF is a better buy in the long-term than WINH.

Price Growth

SSILF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WINH (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.43% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSILF($565M) has a higher market cap than WINH($7.5M). SSILF YTD gains are higher at: 10.308 vs. WINH (-97.196). WINH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.24M vs. SSILF (4.74M). SSILF has more cash in the bank: 303M vs. WINH (1.19M). WINH has less debt than SSILF: WINH (5.28M) vs SSILF (596M). SSILF has higher revenues than WINH: SSILF (3.5B) vs WINH (16.7M).
SSILFWINHSSILF / WINH
Capitalization565M7.5M7,535%
EBITDA4.74M8.24M58%
Gain YTD10.308-97.196-11%
P/E Ratio97.09N/A-
Revenue3.5B16.7M20,964%
Total Cash303M1.19M25,419%
Total Debt596M5.28M11,296%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WINH: Fundamental Ratings
WINH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMDLX23.39-0.09
-0.38%
ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income C
TGVNX30.74-0.18
-0.58%
TCW Relative Value Mid Cap N
VSEMX235.35-3.07
-1.29%
Vanguard Extended Market Index Instl Sel
CHTRX21.31-0.32
-1.48%
Invesco Charter A
CCWRX11.36-0.31
-2.66%
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst3

SSILF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SSILF and WINH have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSILF and WINH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSILF
1D Price
Change %
SSILF100%
N/A
WINH - SSILF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GHST - SSILF
7%
Poorly correlated
+34.20%
ZHSHF - SSILF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EICCF - SSILF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KMRIF - SSILF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WINH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WINH and SSILF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WINH and SSILF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WINH
1D Price
Change %
WINH100%
N/A
SSILF - WINH
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARKO - WINH
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
ZSHGY - WINH
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRVN - WINH
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
EVGO - WINH
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
More