Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
STBFX vs VFSTX
STBFX vs VFSTX Comparison
Open Charts STBFX vs VFSTX
Saturna Short-Term Bond
Price$4.99
Change+$0.01 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.95M
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade I
Price$10.43
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.46B
STBFX vs VFSTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
STBFX vs. VFSTX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STBFX is a Hold and VFSTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFSTX has more cash in the bank: 52.5B vs. STBFX (13.9M). VFSTX pays higher dividends than STBFX: VFSTX (4.28) vs STBFX (2.96). STBFX was incepted earlier than VFSTX: STBFX (30 years) vs VFSTX (43 years). STBFX (0.86) is less costly to investors than VFSTX (0.20). VFSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. STBFX (23.00). STBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFSTX: STBFX (1000) vs VFSTX (3000). STBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.70 vs. VFSTX (2.43). STBFX return over 5 years is better than : 5.58 vs. VFSTX (-4.22).
| STBFX | VFSTX | STBFX / VFSTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.20 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.20 | 430% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.098 | 1.341 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9M | 52.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 4.28 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.70 | 2.43 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.34 | 3.96 | 261% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.58 | -4.22 | -132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.74 | 6.25 | 268% |