STBMF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.06 (+35.29%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
259.86M
STRRF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.01 (-4.17%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
47.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

STBMF vs STRRF

Header iconSTBMF vs STRRF Comparison
Open Charts STBMF vs STRRFBanner chart's image
St. Barbara
Price$0.23
Change+$0.06 (+35.29%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization259.86M
CANADIAN GOLD
Price$0.23
Change-$0.01 (-4.17%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization47.02M
STBMF vs STRRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
STBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STRRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
STBMF vs. STRRF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STBMF is a StrongBuy and STRRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (STBMF: $0.23 vs. STRRF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: STBMF and STRRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: STBMF: 134% vs. STRRF: 4%
Market capitalization -- STBMF: $259.86M vs. STRRF: $47.02M
STBMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $259.86M. STRRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $47.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

STBMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTRRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • STBMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STRRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, STBMF is a better buy in the long-term than STRRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STBMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STRRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • STBMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • STRRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STBMF is a better buy in the short-term than STRRF.

Price Growth

STBMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +35.29% price change this week, while STRRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4218.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.84% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STBMF($260M) has a higher market cap than STRRF($47M). STBMF (120.307) and STRRF (120.152) have similar YTD gains .
STBMFSTRRFSTBMF / STRRF
Capitalization260M47M553%
EBITDAN/A-3.26M-
Gain YTD120.307120.152100%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A3.17M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STBMF vs STRRF: Fundamental Ratings
STBMF
STRRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3819
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10056
SMR RATING
1..100
94100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3838
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STBMF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STRRF (86). This means that STBMF’s stock grew significantly faster than STRRF’s over the last 12 months.

STRRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STBMF (100). This means that STRRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as STRRF (100). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to STRRF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as STRRF (38). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to STRRF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as STRRF (100). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to STRRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
STBMFSTRRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
STBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STRRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEFC11.730.23
+2.00%
Commercial National Financial Corp (MI)
KURRY33.62N/A
N/A
Kuraray Co.
TERRF9.95N/A
N/A
Terna Rete Elettrica Nazionale SPA
ABXXF15.01-0.22
-1.44%
ABAXX Technologies Inc.
OPHRF0.03-0.01
-27.93%
OPHIR METALS CORP.

STBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STBMF has been loosely correlated with GLBKF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STBMF jumps, then GLBKF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STBMF
1D Price
Change %
STBMF100%
N/A
GLBKF - STBMF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSISF - STBMF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDRRF - STBMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
KSSRF - STBMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRRF - STBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.50%
More

STRRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STRRF and EGMCF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STRRF and EGMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STRRF
1D Price
Change %
STRRF100%
N/A
EGMCF - STRRF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDRRF - STRRF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
STBMF - STRRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STPGF - STRRF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%