STBMF
Price
$0.29
Change
+$0.01 (+3.57%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
332.64M
TDRRF
Price
$0.71
Change
-$0.01 (-1.39%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
191.74M
Interact to see
Advertisement

STBMF vs TDRRF

Header iconSTBMF vs TDRRF Comparison
Open Charts STBMF vs TDRRFBanner chart's image
St. Barbara
Price$0.29
Change+$0.01 (+3.57%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization332.64M
TUDOR GOLD CORP NEW
Price$0.71
Change-$0.01 (-1.39%)
Volume$385.51K
Capitalization191.74M
STBMF vs TDRRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
STBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TDRRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
STBMF vs. TDRRF commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STBMF is a Buy and TDRRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (STBMF: $0.29 vs. TDRRF: $0.71)
Brand notoriety: STBMF and TDRRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: STBMF: 422% vs. TDRRF: 197%
Market capitalization -- STBMF: $332.64M vs. TDRRF: $191.74M
STBMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $332.64M. TDRRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $191.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $95.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

STBMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTDRRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • STBMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TDRRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both STBMF and TDRRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STBMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TDRRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • STBMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TDRRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STBMF is a better buy in the short-term than TDRRF.

Price Growth

STBMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.18% price change this week, while TDRRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +7.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +31.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3152.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.28% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STBMF($333M) has a higher market cap than TDRRF($192M). STBMF YTD gains are higher at: 176.724 vs. TDRRF (54.180).
STBMFTDRRFSTBMF / TDRRF
Capitalization333M192M173%
EBITDAN/A-6.27M-
Gain YTD176.72454.180326%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A12.8M-
Total DebtN/A222K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STBMF vs TDRRF: Fundamental Ratings
STBMF
TDRRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4316
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9594
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5046

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STBMF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as TDRRF (39). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to TDRRF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TDRRF (100). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to TDRRF’s over the last 12 months.

TDRRF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as STBMF (95). This means that TDRRF’s stock grew similarly to STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TDRRF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as STBMF (36). This means that TDRRF’s stock grew similarly to STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as TDRRF (100). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to TDRRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
STBMFTDRRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
STBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TDRRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSIPX16.22N/A
N/A
Columbia Disciplined Core Inst2
SIEPX14.74N/A
N/A
Saratoga International Equity I
MRSPX15.76N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage SMID Cap R
WFIOX60.57N/A
N/A
Allspring Index Admin
HFAHX16.53N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders Intl Cntrrn Val Y

STBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STBMF has been loosely correlated with GLBKF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STBMF jumps, then GLBKF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STBMF
1D Price
Change %
STBMF100%
N/A
GLBKF - STBMF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSISF - STBMF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDRRF - STBMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
KSSRF - STBMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.06%
ELRRF - STBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
More

TDRRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TDRRF and MNSAF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TDRRF and MNSAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TDRRF
1D Price
Change %
TDRRF100%
-1.39%
MNSAF - TDRRF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
FFMGF - TDRRF
29%
Poorly correlated
-6.49%
BCEKF - TDRRF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
BTG - TDRRF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
GAYMF - TDRRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-6.30%
More