It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
STKL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
STKL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
STKL (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.01% price change this week, while UTZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +2.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.76%.
STKL is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
UTZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
STKL | UTZ | STKL / UTZ | |
Capitalization | 789M | 1.5B | 53% |
EBITDA | 36.8M | 99.2M | 37% |
Gain YTD | 42.779 | 7.360 | 581% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 81.45 | - |
Revenue | 630M | 1.44B | 44% |
Total Cash | 306K | 52M | 1% |
Total Debt | 379M | 985M | 38% |
STKL | UTZ | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 9 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
STKL's Valuation (86) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as UTZ (92) in the null industry. This means that STKL’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.
UTZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as STKL (64) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to STKL’s over the last 12 months.
UTZ's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as STKL (93) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to STKL’s over the last 12 months.
STKL's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as UTZ (54) in the null industry. This means that STKL’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.
STKL's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for UTZ (96) in the null industry. This means that STKL’s stock grew significantly faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.
STKL | UTZ | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago70% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago79% | 11 days ago64% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago78% | 5 days ago65% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SEMGX | 19.03 | -0.03 | -0.16% |
DWS Emerging Markets Equity S | |||
PDSIX | 45.23 | -0.25 | -0.55% |
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index I | |||
MINHX | 41.60 | -0.26 | -0.62% |
MFS International Intrinsic Value R4 | |||
PSLCX | 11.21 | -0.11 | -0.97% |
Putnam Small Cap Value C | |||
PEGCX | 21.10 | -1.19 | -5.34% |
PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth C |
A.I.dvisor tells us that STKL and HRL have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STKL and HRL's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STKL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
STKL | 100% | +0.26% | ||
HRL - STKL | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
STKH - STKL | 26% Poorly correlated | -5.88% | ||
THS - STKL | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
CENTA - STKL | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
UTZ - STKL | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UTZ has been loosely correlated with FLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UTZ jumps, then FLO could also see price increases.