STLJF
Price
$55.98
Change
-$0.31 (-0.55%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.11B
SVCBF
Price
$13.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
9.38B
Interact to see
Advertisement

STLJF vs SVCBF

Header iconSTLJF vs SVCBF Comparison
Open Charts STLJF vs SVCBFBanner chart's image
Stella Jones
Price$55.98
Change-$0.31 (-0.55%)
Volume$474
Capitalization3.11B
Svenska Cellulosa AB
Price$13.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.13K
Capitalization9.38B
STLJF vs SVCBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
STLJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
STLJF vs. SVCBF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STLJF is a Hold and SVCBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (STLJF: $55.98 vs. SVCBF: $13.05)
Brand notoriety: STLJF and SVCBF are both not notable
STLJF represents the Forest Products, while SVCBF is part of the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: STLJF: 91% vs. SVCBF: 155%
Market capitalization -- STLJF: $3.11B vs. SVCBF: $9.38B
STLJF [@Forest Products] is valued at $3.11B. SVCBF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $9.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $7.19B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $1.72B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

STLJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSVCBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • STLJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SVCBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STLJF is a better buy in the long-term than SVCBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STLJF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVCBF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • STLJF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SVCBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STLJF is a better buy in the short-term than SVCBF.

Price Growth

STLJF (@Forest Products) experienced а -3.57% price change this week, while SVCBF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -0.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was -1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.96%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Forest Products (-1.84% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

@Pulp & Paper (+0.63% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVCBF($9.38B) has a higher market cap than STLJF($3.11B). SVCBF has higher P/E ratio than STLJF: SVCBF (22.65) vs STLJF (13.04). STLJF YTD gains are higher at: 13.220 vs. SVCBF (6.531). SVCBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.32B vs. STLJF (645M). SVCBF has more cash in the bank: 74M vs. STLJF (65M). SVCBF has less debt than STLJF: SVCBF (544M) vs STLJF (1.62B). SVCBF has higher revenues than STLJF: SVCBF (20.9B) vs STLJF (3.45B).
STLJFSVCBFSTLJF / SVCBF
Capitalization3.11B9.38B33%
EBITDA645M7.32B9%
Gain YTD13.2206.531202%
P/E Ratio13.0422.6558%
Revenue3.45B20.9B17%
Total Cash65M74M88%
Total Debt1.62B544M297%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STLJF vs SVCBF: Fundamental Ratings
STLJF
SVCBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6090
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5098
SMR RATING
1..100
5087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5860
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5876
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
845

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STLJF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as SVCBF (33). This means that STLJF’s stock grew similarly to SVCBF’s over the last 12 months.

STLJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVCBF (98). This means that STLJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVCBF’s over the last 12 months.

STLJF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVCBF (87). This means that STLJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVCBF’s over the last 12 months.

STLJF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as SVCBF (60). This means that STLJF’s stock grew similarly to SVCBF’s over the last 12 months.

STLJF's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as SVCBF (76). This means that STLJF’s stock grew similarly to SVCBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
STLJFSVCBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
STLJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CUSUX19.88N/A
N/A
Six Circles U.S. Unconstrained Equity
LPFAX6.61N/A
N/A
ALPS Global Opportunity A
GSQRX34.53N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value R
MVGBX18.34N/A
N/A
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity B
GAHPX29.55N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq P

STLJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STLJF and SVCBF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STLJF and SVCBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STLJF
1D Price
Change %
STLJF100%
N/A
SVCBF - STLJF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UFPI - STLJF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
HMTC - STLJF
4%
Poorly correlated
+22.17%
WFG - STLJF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.18%
SSD - STLJF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
More

SVCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVCBF and STLJF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVCBF and STLJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVCBF
1D Price
Change %
SVCBF100%
N/A
STLJF - SVCBF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWGL - SVCBF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.73%
WFG - SVCBF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.18%
IFSPF - SVCBF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.88%
SCABY - SVCBF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More