SUCEF
Price
$26.05
Change
+$2.55 (+10.85%)
Updated
Mar 8 closing price
Capitalization
970.15M
WCHNF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.04 (-18.18%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
558.03M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SUCEF vs WCHNF

Header iconSUCEF vs WCHNF Comparison
Open Charts SUCEF vs WCHNFBanner chart's image
Sumitomo Osaka Cement
Price$26.05
Change+$2.55 (+10.85%)
Volume$682
Capitalization970.15M
West China Cement
Price$0.18
Change-$0.04 (-18.18%)
Volume$340
Capitalization558.03M
SUCEF vs WCHNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WCHNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SUCEF vs. WCHNF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SUCEF is a Hold and WCHNF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (SUCEF: $26.05 vs. WCHNF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: SUCEF and WCHNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SUCEF: 100% vs. WCHNF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SUCEF: $970.15M vs. WCHNF: $558.03M
SUCEF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $970.15M. WCHNF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $558.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SUCEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWCHNF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SUCEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WCHNF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WCHNF is a better buy in the long-term than SUCEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WCHNF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WCHNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

SUCEF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WCHNF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.80% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SUCEF($970M) has a higher market cap than WCHNF($558M). SUCEF has higher P/E ratio than WCHNF: SUCEF (14.77) vs WCHNF (4.04). SUCEF (0.000) and WCHNF (0.000) have similar YTD gains . WCHNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.43B vs. SUCEF (-1.31B). SUCEF has more cash in the bank: 17.6B vs. WCHNF (3.59B). WCHNF has less debt than SUCEF: WCHNF (9.13B) vs SUCEF (96.3B). SUCEF has higher revenues than WCHNF: SUCEF (198B) vs WCHNF (8B).
SUCEFWCHNFSUCEF / WCHNF
Capitalization970M558M174%
EBITDA-1.31B3.43B-38%
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E Ratio14.774.04365%
Revenue198B8B2,474%
Total Cash17.6B3.59B490%
Total Debt96.3B9.13B1,055%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SUCEF vs WCHNF: Fundamental Ratings
SUCEF
WCHNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4442
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10029
SMR RATING
1..100
9955
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
972
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5042

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SUCEF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as WCHNF (15). This means that SUCEF’s stock grew similarly to WCHNF’s over the last 12 months.

WCHNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUCEF (100). This means that WCHNF’s stock grew significantly faster than SUCEF’s over the last 12 months.

WCHNF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUCEF (99). This means that WCHNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUCEF’s over the last 12 months.

WCHNF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SUCEF (70). This means that WCHNF’s stock grew similarly to SUCEF’s over the last 12 months.

WCHNF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUCEF (97). This means that WCHNF’s stock grew significantly faster than SUCEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SUCEFWCHNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
2%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
2%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WCHNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCIUX11.52N/A
N/A
Invesco Income Advantage U.S. Fund R5
JAAGX80.82N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Instl
RIVSX17.82N/A
N/A
River Oak Discovery
GMAYX23.44N/A
N/A
GMO Small Cap Quality I
PAGSX66.66N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Adv

SUCEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SUCEF and XYIGY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUCEF and XYIGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUCEF
1D Price
Change %
SUCEF100%
N/A
XYIGY - SUCEF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBRBY - SUCEF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
XYIGF - SUCEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSND - SUCEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCHNF - SUCEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WCHNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WCHNF has been closely correlated with WBRBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WCHNF jumps, then WBRBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WCHNF
1D Price
Change %
WCHNF100%
N/A
WBRBF - WCHNF
71%
Closely correlated
N/A
XYIGF - WCHNF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRKWF - WCHNF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XYIGY - WCHNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCY - WCHNF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More