SUCEF
Price
$26.05
Change
+$2.55 (+10.85%)
Updated
Mar 8 closing price
Capitalization
857.46M
WCHNF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.05 (+27.78%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.68B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SUCEF vs WCHNF

Header iconSUCEF vs WCHNF Comparison
Open Charts SUCEF vs WCHNFBanner chart's image
Sumitomo Osaka Cement
Price$26.05
Change+$2.55 (+10.85%)
Volume$682
Capitalization857.46M
West China Cement
Price$0.23
Change+$0.05 (+27.78%)
Volume$590
Capitalization1.68B
SUCEF vs WCHNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WCHNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SUCEF vs. WCHNF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SUCEF is a Hold and WCHNF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (SUCEF: $26.05 vs. WCHNF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: SUCEF and WCHNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SUCEF: 100% vs. WCHNF: 12%
Market capitalization -- SUCEF: $857.46M vs. WCHNF: $1.68B
SUCEF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $857.46M. WCHNF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $1.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $74.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SUCEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWCHNF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SUCEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WCHNF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WCHNF is a better buy in the long-term than SUCEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WCHNF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WCHNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

SUCEF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WCHNF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+0.89% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCHNF($1.68B) has a higher market cap than SUCEF($857M). WCHNF has higher P/E ratio than SUCEF: WCHNF (14.37) vs SUCEF (9.02). WCHNF YTD gains are higher at: 4.727 vs. SUCEF (0.000).
SUCEFWCHNFSUCEF / WCHNF
Capitalization857M1.68B51%
EBITDA37.1BN/A-
Gain YTD0.0004.727-
P/E Ratio9.0214.3763%
Revenue221BN/A-
Total Cash15.8BN/A-
Total Debt86.3BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SUCEF vs WCHNF: Fundamental Ratings
SUCEF
WCHNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4340
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10030
SMR RATING
1..100
9855
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9630
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SUCEF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as WCHNF (12). This means that SUCEF’s stock grew similarly to WCHNF’s over the last 12 months.

WCHNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUCEF (100). This means that WCHNF’s stock grew significantly faster than SUCEF’s over the last 12 months.

WCHNF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUCEF (98). This means that WCHNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUCEF’s over the last 12 months.

WCHNF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SUCEF (70). This means that WCHNF’s stock grew similarly to SUCEF’s over the last 12 months.

WCHNF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUCEF (96). This means that WCHNF’s stock grew significantly faster than SUCEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SUCEFWCHNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WCHNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BCSVX26.840.03
+0.11%
Brown Capital Mgmt Intl Sm Co Inv
POGAX76.51N/A
N/A
Putnam Large Cap Growth A
EMAYX18.05N/A
N/A
Gabelli Entpr Mergers & Acquisitions Y
PJRAX9.41N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions International Eq A
KDHIX54.17N/A
N/A
DWS CROCI Equity Dividend Inst

SUCEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SUCEF and XYIGY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUCEF and XYIGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUCEF
1D Price
Change %
SUCEF100%
N/A
XYIGY - SUCEF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
WBRBY - SUCEF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.31%
XYIGF - SUCEF
0%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
BSND - SUCEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCHNF - SUCEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WCHNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WCHNF has been closely correlated with WBRBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WCHNF jumps, then WBRBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WCHNF
1D Price
Change %
WCHNF100%
N/A
WBRBF - WCHNF
71%
Closely correlated
N/A
XYIGF - WCHNF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
BRKWF - WCHNF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XYIGY - WCHNF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
THYCY - WCHNF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More