Advertisement
SUND vs SWSDF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SUND is a Hold and SWSDF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SUND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSWSDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SUND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SWSDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
SUND (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SWSDF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.82%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Multi-Line Insurance (+0.40% weekly)A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
| SUND | SWSDF | SUND / SWSDF | |
| Capitalization | 15.3M | 18B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -3.04M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -45.360 | 36.058 | -126% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 11.66 | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 21.3B | - |
| Total Cash | 3.16K | 83.6B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 3.26M | 11.3B | 0% |
SUND | SWSDF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SWSDF's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as SUND (90). This means that SWSDF’s stock grew similarly to SUND’s over the last 12 months.
SWSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUND (100). This means that SWSDF’s stock grew significantly faster than SUND’s over the last 12 months.
SWSDF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as SUND (100). This means that SWSDF’s stock grew similarly to SUND’s over the last 12 months.
SWSDF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SUND (65). This means that SWSDF’s stock grew similarly to SUND’s over the last 12 months.
SWSDF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUND (69). This means that SWSDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUND’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
Advertisement
SUND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SUND and SAXPF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUND and SAXPF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SUND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUND | 100% | +2.34% | ||
| SAXPF - SUND | 14% Poorly correlated | -2.02% | ||
| SAXPY - SUND | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.96% | ||
| NNGRY - SUND | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
| TNXXF - SUND | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SWSDF - SUND | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SWSDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SWSDF and NDEV have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWSDF and NDEV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SWSDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWSDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NDEV - SWSDF | 7% Poorly correlated | +21.25% | ||
| SAXPF - SWSDF | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.02% | ||
| SZLMY - SWSDF | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.74% | ||
| NNGPF - SWSDF | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
| SAXPY - SWSDF | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.96% | ||
More | ||||