SURDF
Price
$43.24
Change
+$2.28 (+5.57%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
19.32B
SWPFF
Price
$2.69
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.45B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SURDF vs SWPFF

Header iconSURDF vs SWPFF Comparison
Open Charts SURDF vs SWPFFBanner chart's image
Sumitomo Realty & Development
Price$43.24
Change+$2.28 (+5.57%)
Volume$585
Capitalization19.32B
Swire Properties
Price$2.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
Capitalization15.45B
SURDF vs SWPFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SURDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SURDF vs. SWPFF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SURDF is a Hold and SWPFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SURDF: $43.24 vs. SWPFF: $2.69)
Brand notoriety: SURDF and SWPFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SURDF: 117% vs. SWPFF: 15%
Market capitalization -- SURDF: $19.32B vs. SWPFF: $15.45B
SURDF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $19.32B. SWPFF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $15.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SURDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSWPFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SURDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SWPFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SURDF and SWPFF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SURDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWPFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SURDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SWPFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SURDF is a better buy in the short-term than SWPFF.

Price Growth

SURDF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SWPFF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.87% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SURDF($19.3B) has a higher market cap than SWPFF($15.5B). SWPFF has higher P/E ratio than SURDF: SWPFF (38.23) vs SURDF (15.80). SURDF YTD gains are higher at: 36.886 vs. SWPFF (33.499).
SURDFSWPFFSURDF / SWPFF
Capitalization19.3B15.5B125%
EBITDA352BN/A-
Gain YTD36.88633.499110%
P/E Ratio15.8038.2341%
Revenue1TN/A-
Total Cash74.1BN/A-
Total Debt3.87TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SURDF vs SWPFF: Fundamental Ratings
SURDF
SWPFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4387
SMR RATING
1..100
10088
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4343
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2435
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SWPFF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SURDF (95). This means that SWPFF’s stock grew significantly faster than SURDF’s over the last 12 months.

SURDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWPFF (87). This means that SURDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWPFF’s over the last 12 months.

SWPFF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as SURDF (100). This means that SWPFF’s stock grew similarly to SURDF’s over the last 12 months.

SWPFF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SURDF (43). This means that SWPFF’s stock grew similarly to SURDF’s over the last 12 months.

SURDF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as SWPFF (35). This means that SURDF’s stock grew similarly to SWPFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SURDFSWPFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SURDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EFNL42.310.52
+1.24%
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
IJJ131.930.50
+0.38%
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
KJUL30.710.11
+0.34%
Innovator Russell 2000 Pwr Bffr ETF™ Jul
GJUL40.04-0.03
-0.07%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Jul
CERY27.95-0.09
-0.32%
SPDR Blmbrg Enh Roll Y Cmd Stgy NoK-1ETF

SURDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SURDF has been loosely correlated with SRRLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SURDF jumps, then SRRLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SURDF
1D Price
Change %
SURDF100%
N/A
SRRLF - SURDF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GRGTF - SURDF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWPFF - SURDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVAUF - SURDF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A