SUTNY
Price
$5.20
Change
-$0.01 (-0.19%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
14.28B
WF
Price
$32.52
Change
-$0.76 (-2.28%)
Updated
Mar 10, 04:45 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.73B
37 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SUTNY vs WF

Header iconSUTNY vs WF Comparison
Open Charts SUTNY vs WFBanner chart's image
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group
Price$5.20
Change-$0.01 (-0.19%)
Volume$58.25K
Capitalization14.28B
Woori Financial Group
Price$32.52
Change-$0.76 (-2.28%)
Volume$100
Capitalization7.73B
SUTNY vs WF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SUTNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SUTNY vs. WF commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SUTNY is a Hold and WF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (SUTNY: $5.20 vs. WF: $33.29)
Brand notoriety: SUTNY and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SUTNY: 74% vs. WF: 90%
Market capitalization -- SUTNY: $14.28B vs. WF: $7.73B
SUTNY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $14.28B. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $7.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SUTNY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SUTNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the long-term than SUTNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SUTNY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SUTNY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the short-term than SUTNY.

Price Growth

SUTNY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.97% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

SUTNY is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

WF is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SUTNY($14.3B) has a higher market cap than WF($7.73B). SUTNY has higher P/E ratio than WF: SUTNY (10.30) vs WF (3.62). SUTNY YTD gains are higher at: 10.638 vs. WF (6.528). WF has higher revenues than SUTNY: WF (11.84T) vs SUTNY (1.14T).
SUTNYWFSUTNY / WF
Capitalization14.3B7.73B185%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.6386.528163%
P/E Ratio10.303.62284%
Revenue1.14T11.84T10%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt17.12TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SUTNY vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
SUTNY
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
131
SMR RATING
1..100
1001
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4855
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9644
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WF's Valuation (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SUTNY (31) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SUTNY (13) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.

WF's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUTNY (100) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew significantly faster than SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.

SUTNY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as WF (55) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SUTNY’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.

WF's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUTNY (96) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SUTNYWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SUTNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSISX11.510.14
+1.23%
Hartford Schroders Sust Intl Core I
EPDPX10.460.11
+1.06%
EuroPac International Dividend Income A
LVORX16.900.09
+0.54%
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities R3
BARAX89.02-0.10
-0.11%
Baron Asset Retail
NSNRX43.32-0.10
-0.23%
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R3

SUTNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUTNY has been closely correlated with MFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SUTNY jumps, then MFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUTNY
1D Price
Change %
SUTNY100%
-0.19%
MFG - SUTNY
71%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
DBSDY - SUTNY
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
WF - SUTNY
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
ONB - SUTNY
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
SHG - SUTNY
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
More