SUTNY
Price
$5.82
Change
-$0.02 (-0.34%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
20.29B
WF
Price
$56.99
Change
-$0.77 (-1.33%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
13.87B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SUTNY vs WF

Header iconSUTNY vs WF Comparison
Open Charts SUTNY vs WFBanner chart's image
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group
Price$5.82
Change-$0.02 (-0.34%)
Volume$68.21K
Capitalization20.29B
Woori Financial Group
Price$56.99
Change-$0.77 (-1.33%)
Volume$36.61K
Capitalization13.87B
SUTNY vs WF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SUTNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SUTNY vs. WF commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SUTNY is a Hold and WF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (SUTNY: $5.82 vs. WF: $56.99)
Brand notoriety: SUTNY and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SUTNY: 102% vs. WF: 60%
Market capitalization -- SUTNY: $20.29B vs. WF: $13.87B
SUTNY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $20.29B. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $13.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SUTNY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SUTNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the long-term than SUTNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SUTNY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SUTNY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the short-term than SUTNY.

Price Growth

SUTNY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.68% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

WF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SUTNY($20.3B) has a higher market cap than WF($13.9B). SUTNY has higher P/E ratio than WF: SUTNY (10.87) vs WF (7.13). WF YTD gains are higher at: 85.961 vs. SUTNY (23.830). SUTNY has less debt than WF: SUTNY (18.57T) vs WF (80.55T). WF has higher revenues than SUTNY: WF (12.85T) vs SUTNY (1.52T).
SUTNYWFSUTNY / WF
Capitalization20.3B13.9B146%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.83085.96128%
P/E Ratio10.877.13152%
Revenue1.52T12.85T12%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt18.57T80.55T23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SUTNY vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
SUTNY
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
556
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1112
SMR RATING
1..100
1001
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9514
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WF's Valuation (64) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SUTNY (82) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.

SUTNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as WF (12) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SUTNY’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.

WF's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUTNY (100) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew significantly faster than SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SUTNY (51) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.

WF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUTNY (95) in the null industry. This means that WF’s stock grew significantly faster than SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SUTNYWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SUTNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEAR50.540.06
+0.12%
iShares Short Maturity Muni Bd Act ETF
PCLO25.02N/A
-0.02%
Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF
PPI17.85-0.08
-0.44%
Astoria Real Asset ETF
ION36.47-0.19
-0.52%
ProShares S&P Global Cor Btty Mtls ETF
USCI77.61-1.25
-1.58%
United States Commodity Index

SUTNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUTNY has been closely correlated with MFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SUTNY jumps, then MFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUTNY
1D Price
Change %
SUTNY100%
-0.31%
MFG - SUTNY
71%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
DBSDY - SUTNY
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
WF - SUTNY
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
ONB - SUTNY
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
SHG - SUTNY
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
More