SUUIF vs TKGSY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SUUIF is a Hold and TKGSY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SUUIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTKGSY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SUUIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TKGSY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
SUUIF (@Gas Distributors) experienced а -1.82% price change this week, while TKGSY (@Gas Distributors) price change was -2.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Gas Distributors industry was -0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.42%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Gas Distributors (-0.56% weekly)Gas distributors are involved in moving and selling gas – from wellheads or over-distribution systems operated by other firms – to residential and non-residential customers. These companies perform tasks such as the gathering and processing of gas, intrastate and interstate transport, and delivery to the customer. Some of the biggest gas distributing companies in the U.S. include Sempra Energy, Avangrid Inc and Atmos Energy Corporation.
| SUUIF | TKGSY | SUUIF / TKGSY | |
| Capitalization | 1.86B | 9.75B | 19% |
| EBITDA | 251M | 319B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -38.196 | 7.074 | -540% |
| P/E Ratio | 303.03 | 5.05 | 5,997% |
| Revenue | 3.47B | 3.04T | 0% |
| Total Cash | 90.8M | 307B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 1.9B | 1.26T | 0% |
SUUIF | TKGSY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 26 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SUUIF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TKGSY (60). This means that SUUIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TKGSY’s over the last 12 months.
TKGSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as SUUIF (100). This means that TKGSY’s stock grew similarly to SUUIF’s over the last 12 months.
TKGSY's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as SUUIF (86). This means that TKGSY’s stock grew similarly to SUUIF’s over the last 12 months.
TKGSY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUUIF (87). This means that TKGSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUUIF’s over the last 12 months.
TKGSY's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUUIF (39). This means that TKGSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUUIF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
SUUIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SUUIF and BIPC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUUIF and BIPC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SUUIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUUIF | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| BIPC - SUUIF | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.58% | ||
| TKGSY - SUUIF | 14% Poorly correlated | +4.15% | ||
| XNGSY - SUUIF | 13% Poorly correlated | -2.20% | ||
| OPAL - SUUIF | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| SNMRY - SUUIF | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
More | ||||
TKGSY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TKGSY and SNMRY have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TKGSY and SNMRY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TKGSY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKGSY | 100% | +4.15% | ||
| SNMRY - TKGSY | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
| SUUIF - TKGSY | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.61% | ||
| XNGSF - TKGSY | 3% Poorly correlated | -14.13% | ||
| TKGSF - TKGSY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OPAL - TKGSY | -1% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
More | ||||