SVCTF
Price
$264.89
Change
+$20.99 (+8.61%)
Updated
Sep 16 closing price
Capitalization
639.07M
TGOPY
Price
$13.40
Change
+$0.25 (+1.90%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
50.54B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SVCTF vs TGOPY

Header iconSVCTF vs TGOPY Comparison
Open Charts SVCTF vs TGOPYBanner chart's image
Senvest Capital
Price$264.89
Change+$20.99 (+8.61%)
Volume$110
Capitalization639.07M
3i Group
Price$13.40
Change+$0.25 (+1.90%)
Volume$917.27K
Capitalization50.54B
SVCTF vs TGOPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SVCTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGOPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SVCTF vs. TGOPY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SVCTF is a Buy and TGOPY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (SVCTF: $264.89 vs. TGOPY: $13.40)
Brand notoriety: SVCTF and TGOPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SVCTF: 89% vs. TGOPY: 251%
Market capitalization -- SVCTF: $639.07M vs. TGOPY: $50.54B
SVCTF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $639.07M. TGOPY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $50.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SVCTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTGOPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SVCTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TGOPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TGOPY is a better buy in the long-term than SVCTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SVCTF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGOPY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SVCTF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TGOPY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TGOPY is a better buy in the short-term than SVCTF.

Price Growth

SVCTF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TGOPY (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

TGOPY is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.00% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TGOPY($50.5B) has a higher market cap than SVCTF($639M). TGOPY has higher P/E ratio than SVCTF: TGOPY (7.61) vs SVCTF (5.27). TGOPY YTD gains are higher at: 21.046 vs. SVCTF (0.337). TGOPY has higher revenues than SVCTF: TGOPY (5.19B) vs SVCTF (766M).
SVCTFTGOPYSVCTF / TGOPY
Capitalization639M50.5B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.33721.0462%
P/E Ratio5.277.6169%
Revenue766M5.19B15%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt641KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SVCTF vs TGOPY: Fundamental Ratings
SVCTF
TGOPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3484
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
373
SMR RATING
1..100
8342
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1457
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TGOPY's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVCTF (72). This means that TGOPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVCTF’s over the last 12 months.

TGOPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVCTF (37). This means that TGOPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVCTF’s over the last 12 months.

TGOPY's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVCTF (83). This means that TGOPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVCTF’s over the last 12 months.

SVCTF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as TGOPY (59). This means that SVCTF’s stock grew similarly to TGOPY’s over the last 12 months.

SVCTF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGOPY (57). This means that SVCTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGOPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SVCTFTGOPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SVCTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGOPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBAT0.910.03
+3.08%
CBAK Energy Technology
HNI44.840.28
+0.63%
HNI Corp
DTM111.150.63
+0.57%
DT Midstream
FBYD11.92-0.05
-0.42%
Falcon's Beyond Global Inc
BBLG2.13-0.02
-0.93%
Bone Biologics Corp

SVCTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVCTF has been loosely correlated with MGLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVCTF jumps, then MGLLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVCTF
1D Price
Change %
SVCTF100%
N/A
MGLLF - SVCTF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GMHLF - SVCTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGOPY - SVCTF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
STJPF - SVCTF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UBAAF - SVCTF
3%
Poorly correlated
-10.57%
More

TGOPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGOPY has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGOPY jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGOPY
1D Price
Change %
TGOPY100%
+1.90%
BN - TGOPY
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
BAM - TGOPY
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.86%
TPG - TGOPY
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
HLNE - TGOPY
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.19%
AAMI - TGOPY
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
More