SVCTF
Price
$241.02
Change
-$1.72 (-0.71%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
611.59M
UBAAF
Price
$4.68
Change
+$0.08 (+1.74%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
127.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SVCTF vs UBAAF

Header iconSVCTF vs UBAAF Comparison
Open Charts SVCTF vs UBAAFBanner chart's image
Senvest Capital
Price$241.02
Change-$1.72 (-0.71%)
Volume$300
Capitalization611.59M
Urbana
Price$4.68
Change+$0.08 (+1.74%)
Volume$150
Capitalization127.58M
SVCTF vs UBAAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SVCTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SVCTF vs. UBAAF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SVCTF is a Hold and UBAAF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SVCTF: $241.02 vs. UBAAF: $4.68)
Brand notoriety: SVCTF and UBAAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SVCTF: 142% vs. UBAAF: 2%
Market capitalization -- SVCTF: $611.59M vs. UBAAF: $127.58M
SVCTF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $611.59M. UBAAF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $127.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SVCTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUBAAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SVCTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UBAAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBAAF is a better buy in the long-term than SVCTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SVCTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBAAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SVCTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UBAAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SVCTF and UBAAF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SVCTF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.71% price change this week, while UBAAF (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVCTF($612M) has a higher market cap than UBAAF($128M). UBAAF has higher P/E ratio than SVCTF: UBAAF (8.80) vs SVCTF (5.58). UBAAF YTD gains are higher at: 17.323 vs. SVCTF (-8.705). SVCTF has more cash in the bank: 3.56M vs. UBAAF (2.05M). SVCTF has less debt than UBAAF: SVCTF (1.38M) vs UBAAF (36.1M). UBAAF has higher revenues than SVCTF: UBAAF (-6.33M) vs SVCTF (-202.41M).
SVCTFUBAAFSVCTF / UBAAF
Capitalization612M128M478%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.70517.323-50%
P/E Ratio5.588.8063%
Revenue-202.41M-6.33M3,195%
Total Cash3.56M2.05M174%
Total Debt1.38M36.1M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SVCTF vs UBAAF: Fundamental Ratings
SVCTF
UBAAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5046
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3812
SMR RATING
1..100
9361
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
976
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UBAAF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SVCTF (69). This means that UBAAF’s stock grew similarly to SVCTF’s over the last 12 months.

UBAAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as SVCTF (38). This means that UBAAF’s stock grew similarly to SVCTF’s over the last 12 months.

UBAAF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as SVCTF (93). This means that UBAAF’s stock grew similarly to SVCTF’s over the last 12 months.

UBAAF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SVCTF (61). This means that UBAAF’s stock grew similarly to SVCTF’s over the last 12 months.

UBAAF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SVCTF (97). This means that UBAAF’s stock grew significantly faster than SVCTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SVCTFUBAAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SVCTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIDGX33.970.37
+1.10%
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Z
GGGIX64.860.61
+0.95%
Gabelli Global Growth I
SAOPX15.410.10
+0.65%
Barrett Opportunity Retail
AUICX34.280.21
+0.62%
AB Equity Income C
GCCSX33.050.17
+0.52%
Gabelli Small Cap Growth C

SVCTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVCTF has been loosely correlated with MGLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVCTF jumps, then MGLLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVCTF
1D Price
Change %
SVCTF100%
N/A
MGLLF - SVCTF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GMHLF - SVCTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGOPY - SVCTF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
STJPF - SVCTF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UBAAF - SVCTF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UBAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UBAAF and ADLRF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UBAAF and ADLRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBAAF
1D Price
Change %
UBAAF100%
N/A
ADLRF - UBAAF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TSRUF - UBAAF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
URNAF - UBAAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WNDLF - UBAAF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVCTF - UBAAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More