SWDBY
Price
$28.30
Change
+$0.11 (+0.39%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
31.76B
47 days until earnings call
SWZNF
Price
$4093.00
Change
-$7.00 (-0.17%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
395.54M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SWDBY vs SWZNF

Header iconSWDBY vs SWZNF Comparison
Open Charts SWDBY vs SWZNFBanner chart's image
Swedbank AB
Price$28.30
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
Volume$9.35K
Capitalization31.76B
Schweizerische Nationalbank
Price$4093.00
Change-$7.00 (-0.17%)
Volume$2
Capitalization395.54M
SWDBY vs SWZNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SWDBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SWDBY vs. SWZNF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SWDBY is a StrongBuy and SWZNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SWDBY: $28.30 vs. SWZNF: $4093.00)
Brand notoriety: SWDBY and SWZNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SWDBY: 67% vs. SWZNF: 70%
Market capitalization -- SWDBY: $31.76B vs. SWZNF: $395.54M
SWDBY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $31.76B. SWZNF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $395.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SWDBY’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSWZNF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SWDBY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • SWZNF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SWDBY is a better buy in the long-term than SWZNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SWDBY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWZNF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SWDBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SWZNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SWDBY and SWZNF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SWDBY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.39% price change this week, while SWZNF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

SWDBY is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWDBY($31.8B) has a higher market cap than SWZNF($396M). SWDBY has higher P/E ratio than SWZNF: SWDBY (8.89) vs SWZNF (0.04). SWDBY YTD gains are higher at: 71.081 vs. SWZNF (15.707). SWZNF has less debt than SWDBY: SWZNF (122B) vs SWDBY (943B). SWDBY has higher revenues than SWZNF: SWDBY (71.3B) vs SWZNF (58B).
SWDBYSWZNFSWDBY / SWZNF
Capitalization31.8B396M8,030%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD71.08115.707453%
P/E Ratio8.890.0423,287%
Revenue71.3B58B123%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt943B122B773%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SWDBY vs SWZNF: Fundamental Ratings
SWDBY
SWZNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7796
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
12100
SMR RATING
1..100
212
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4456
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
274
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SWZNF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as SWDBY (21). This means that SWZNF’s stock grew similarly to SWDBY’s over the last 12 months.

SWDBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SWZNF (100). This means that SWDBY’s stock grew significantly faster than SWZNF’s over the last 12 months.

SWDBY's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as SWZNF (12). This means that SWDBY’s stock grew similarly to SWZNF’s over the last 12 months.

SWDBY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SWZNF (56). This means that SWDBY’s stock grew similarly to SWZNF’s over the last 12 months.

SWZNF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as SWDBY (27). This means that SWZNF’s stock grew similarly to SWDBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SWDBYSWZNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SWDBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMKBX24.05N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Emerging Mkts A
RYKAX100.87N/A
N/A
Rydex Banking H
MUERX36.43N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Core Equity R1
TIDDX74.90N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price International Discovery I
RMGSX11.66N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Multi-Asset Strat S

SWDBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SWDBY has been loosely correlated with NRDBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SWDBY jumps, then NRDBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWDBY
1D Price
Change %
SWDBY100%
+0.39%
NRDBY - SWDBY
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
DNBBY - SWDBY
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
ISNPY - SWDBY
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
BNPQY - SWDBY
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
CRARY - SWDBY
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
More

SWZNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWZNF and SVBT have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWZNF and SVBT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWZNF
1D Price
Change %
SWZNF100%
N/A
SVBT - SWZNF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWDBF - SWZNF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
SWDBY - SWZNF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
SYANY - SWZNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDCB - SWZNF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More