Advertisement
SWDHF vs TCLHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SWDHF is a Hold and TCLHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SWDHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTCLHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SWDHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TCLHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SWDHF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCLHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SWDHF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
- TCLHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
SWDHF (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TCLHF (@Computer Peripherals) price change was +3.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.05%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Peripherals (-0.79% weekly)Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
| SWDHF | TCLHF | SWDHF / TCLHF | |
| Capitalization | 999M | 3.1B | 32% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.982 | 54.409 | -15% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.85 | 11.15 | 178% |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
SWDHF | TCLHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 58 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TCLHF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as SWDHF (16). This means that TCLHF’s stock grew similarly to SWDHF’s over the last 12 months.
TCLHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as SWDHF (87). This means that TCLHF’s stock grew similarly to SWDHF’s over the last 12 months.
SWDHF's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as TCLHF (89). This means that SWDHF’s stock grew similarly to TCLHF’s over the last 12 months.
TCLHF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SWDHF (75). This means that TCLHF’s stock grew similarly to SWDHF’s over the last 12 months.
SWDHF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCLHF (59). This means that SWDHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCLHF’s over the last 12 months.
| SWDHF | TCLHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 13% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 25% | 4 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 25% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 22 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 20% | 4 days ago 78% |
Advertisement
SWDHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SWDHF and SHCAY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWDHF and SHCAY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SWDHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWDHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SHCAY - SWDHF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RIME - SWDHF | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.92% | ||
| SNCPF - SWDHF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TCLHF - SWDHF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHCAF - SWDHF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TCLHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TCLHF and RIME have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCLHF and RIME's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TCLHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCLHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RIME - TCLHF | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.92% | ||
| XIACY - TCLHF | 1% Poorly correlated | -2.32% | ||
| SWDHF - TCLHF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNCPF - TCLHF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| XIACF - TCLHF | -0% Poorly correlated | -3.35% | ||
More | ||||