Advertisement
SWSDF vs SZLMY
To understand the difference between Swiss Life Holding (SWSDF) vs. Swiss Life Holding - ADR (SZLMY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SWSDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSZLMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- SWSDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SZLMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SWSDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SZLMY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SWSDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SZLMY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
SWSDF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SZLMY (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +6.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +2.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.91%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Multi-Line Insurance (+2.74% weekly)A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
| SWSDF | SZLMY | SWSDF / SZLMY | |
| Capitalization | 18B | 18B | 100% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 45.488 | 46.129 | 99% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.66 | 11.56 | 101% |
| Revenue | 21.3B | 21.3B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 83.6B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 11.3B | N/A | - |
SWSDF | SZLMY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SWSDF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as SZLMY (56). This means that SWSDF’s stock grew similarly to SZLMY’s over the last 12 months.
SZLMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as SWSDF (11). This means that SZLMY’s stock grew similarly to SWSDF’s over the last 12 months.
SWSDF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as SZLMY (97). This means that SWSDF’s stock grew similarly to SZLMY’s over the last 12 months.
SZLMY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SWSDF (44). This means that SZLMY’s stock grew similarly to SWSDF’s over the last 12 months.
SZLMY's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as SWSDF (32). This means that SZLMY’s stock grew similarly to SWSDF’s over the last 12 months.
| SWSDF | SZLMY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 23 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CHIQ | 21.49 | 0.30 | +1.42% |
| Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF | |||
| BSTP | 35.11 | 0.16 | +0.45% |
| Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF | |||
| IBHF | 23.18 | 0.02 | +0.06% |
| iShares iBonds 2026 Term HY & Inc ETF | |||
| MCHS | 30.83 | N/A | N/A |
| Matthews China Discovery Active ETF | |||
| GLD | 310.50 | -0.66 | -0.21% |
| SPDR® Gold Shares | |||
SWSDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SWSDF and NDEV have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWSDF and NDEV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SWSDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWSDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NDEV - SWSDF | 7% Poorly correlated | -8.49% | ||
| SAXPF - SWSDF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SZLMY - SWSDF | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.27% | ||
| NNGPF - SWSDF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SAXPY - SWSDF | 0% Poorly correlated | +4.62% | ||
More | ||||
SZLMY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SZLMY and ARZGY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SZLMY and ARZGY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SZLMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SZLMY | 100% | +1.27% | ||
| ARZGY - SZLMY | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.61% | ||
| ZURVY - SZLMY | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.79% | ||
| AVVIY - SZLMY | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
| SLF - SZLMY | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.75% | ||
| ALIZY - SZLMY | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.36% | ||
More | ||||