It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SWZCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTELNY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SWZCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TELNY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
SWZCF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -2.23% price change this week, while TELNY (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +0.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.02%.
TELNY is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
SWZCF | TELNY | SWZCF / TELNY | |
Capitalization | 37.9B | 23B | 165% |
EBITDA | 5.27B | 36.9B | 14% |
Gain YTD | 30.126 | 59.763 | 50% |
P/E Ratio | 22.62 | 22.36 | 101% |
Revenue | 13B | 80.6B | 16% |
Total Cash | 200M | 7.46B | 3% |
Total Debt | 3.73B | 100B | 4% |
SWZCF | TELNY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 37 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TELNY's Valuation (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SWZCF (97). This means that TELNY’s stock grew significantly faster than SWZCF’s over the last 12 months.
SWZCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as TELNY (47). This means that SWZCF’s stock grew similarly to TELNY’s over the last 12 months.
TELNY's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as SWZCF (65). This means that TELNY’s stock grew similarly to SWZCF’s over the last 12 months.
TELNY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SWZCF (49). This means that TELNY’s stock grew similarly to SWZCF’s over the last 12 months.
SWZCF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as TELNY (37). This means that SWZCF’s stock grew similarly to TELNY’s over the last 12 months.
SWZCF | TELNY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago22% | 1 day ago51% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago25% | 1 day ago45% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago37% | 1 day ago58% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago24% | 1 day ago44% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago25% | 1 day ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago54% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago30% | 4 days ago56% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 29 days ago46% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago26% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago37% | 1 day ago51% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SWZCF has been loosely correlated with SCMWY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SWZCF jumps, then SCMWY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SWZCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SWZCF | 100% | N/A | ||
SCMWY - SWZCF | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.16% | ||
TELNY - SWZCF | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.71% | ||
TELNF - SWZCF | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
SRHBY - SWZCF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TEFOF - SWZCF | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.46% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TELNY has been loosely correlated with TLSNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TELNY jumps, then TLSNY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TELNY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TELNY | 100% | -0.71% | ||
TLSNY - TELNY | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
TEF - TELNY | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
RCI - TELNY | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
VOD - TELNY | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
TU - TELNY | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.91% | ||
More |