SWZNF
Price
$4100.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
395.1M
TDCB
Price
$8.90
Change
-$0.20 (-2.20%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
10.47M
75 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SWZNF vs TDCB

Header iconSWZNF vs TDCB Comparison
Open Charts SWZNF vs TDCBBanner chart's image
Schweizerische Nationalbank
Price$4100.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3
Capitalization395.1M
Third Century Ban
Price$8.90
Change-$0.20 (-2.20%)
Volume$141
Capitalization10.47M
SWZNF vs TDCB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SWZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TDCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SWZNF vs. TDCB commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SWZNF is a Buy and TDCB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (SWZNF: $4100.00 vs. TDCB: $8.90)
Brand notoriety: SWZNF and TDCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SWZNF: 128% vs. TDCB: 9%
Market capitalization -- SWZNF: $395.1M vs. TDCB: $10.47M
SWZNF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $395.1M. TDCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $10.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SWZNF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTDCB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SWZNF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TDCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SWZNF is a better buy in the long-term than TDCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SWZNF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TDCB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SWZNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • TDCB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TDCB is a better buy in the short-term than SWZNF.

Price Growth

SWZNF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TDCB (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

TDCB is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWZNF($395M) has a higher market cap than TDCB($10.5M). TDCB has higher P/E ratio than SWZNF: TDCB (7.88) vs SWZNF (0.01). SWZNF YTD gains are higher at: 15.905 vs. TDCB (-0.304). TDCB has less debt than SWZNF: TDCB (24.6M) vs SWZNF (122B). SWZNF has higher revenues than TDCB: SWZNF (58B) vs TDCB (9.17M).
SWZNFTDCBSWZNF / TDCB
Capitalization395M10.5M3,762%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.905-0.304-5,239%
P/E Ratio0.017.880%
Revenue58B9.17M632,428%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt122B24.6M495,935%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SWZNF vs TDCB: Fundamental Ratings
SWZNF
TDCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4888
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1255
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5554
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2810
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SWZNF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as TDCB (38). This means that SWZNF’s stock grew similarly to TDCB’s over the last 12 months.

SWZNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TDCB (100). This means that SWZNF’s stock grew similarly to TDCB’s over the last 12 months.

SWZNF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TDCB (55). This means that SWZNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TDCB’s over the last 12 months.

TDCB's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as SWZNF (55). This means that TDCB’s stock grew similarly to SWZNF’s over the last 12 months.

TDCB's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as SWZNF (28). This means that TDCB’s stock grew similarly to SWZNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SWZNFTDCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SWZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TDCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYMQX24.70-0.03
-0.12%
Guggenheim Multi-Hedge Strategies A
BUFDX33.76-0.09
-0.27%
Buffalo Growth & Income
CIPSX21.22-0.06
-0.28%
Champlain Small Company Adv
ISTIX85.69-0.49
-0.57%
Macquarie Science and Technology I
DHTAX25.28-0.18
-0.71%
Diamond Hill Select Inv

TDCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TDCB and FKYS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TDCB and FKYS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TDCB
1D Price
Change %
TDCB100%
N/A
FKYS - TDCB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ILPMF - TDCB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BQCNF - TDCB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDVR - TDCB
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
HARL - TDCB
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
More