SXOOF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
24.01M
TLGRF
Price
$0.27
Change
-$0.02 (-7.14%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
319.56M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SXOOF vs TLGRF

Header iconSXOOF vs TLGRF Comparison
Open Charts SXOOF vs TLGRFBanner chart's image
St Georges Eco Mng
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization24.01M
TALGA GROUP
Price$0.27
Change-$0.02 (-7.14%)
Volume$3.69K
Capitalization319.56M
SXOOF vs TLGRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SXOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SXOOF vs. TLGRF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SXOOF is a Hold and TLGRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (SXOOF: $0.04 vs. TLGRF: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: SXOOF and TLGRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SXOOF: 2% vs. TLGRF: 25%
Market capitalization -- SXOOF: $24.01M vs. TLGRF: $319.56M
SXOOF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $24.01M. TLGRF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $319.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SXOOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTLGRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SXOOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TLGRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SXOOF and TLGRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SXOOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLGRF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SXOOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TLGRF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 8 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SXOOF is a better buy in the short-term than TLGRF.

Price Growth

SXOOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +9.50% price change this week, while TLGRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TLGRF($320M) has a higher market cap than SXOOF($24M). SXOOF YTD gains are higher at: 21.667 vs. TLGRF (1.300). SXOOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -9.5M vs. TLGRF (-35.21M). TLGRF has more cash in the bank: 5.08M vs. SXOOF (3.86M). TLGRF has less debt than SXOOF: TLGRF (207K) vs SXOOF (11.2M). TLGRF has higher revenues than SXOOF: TLGRF (113K) vs SXOOF (0).
SXOOFTLGRFSXOOF / TLGRF
Capitalization24M320M8%
EBITDA-9.5M-35.21M27%
Gain YTD21.6671.3001,667%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0113K-
Total Cash3.86M5.08M76%
Total Debt11.2M207K5,411%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SXOOF vs TLGRF: Fundamental Ratings
SXOOF
TLGRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97100
SMR RATING
1..100
7796
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6459
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TLGRF's Valuation (87) in the null industry is in the same range as SXOOF (98). This means that TLGRF’s stock grew similarly to SXOOF’s over the last 12 months.

SXOOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as TLGRF (100). This means that SXOOF’s stock grew similarly to TLGRF’s over the last 12 months.

SXOOF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as TLGRF (96). This means that SXOOF’s stock grew similarly to TLGRF’s over the last 12 months.

TLGRF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as SXOOF (64). This means that TLGRF’s stock grew similarly to SXOOF’s over the last 12 months.

SXOOF's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as TLGRF (100). This means that SXOOF’s stock grew similarly to TLGRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SXOOFTLGRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SXOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLGRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAQL0.810.12
+17.39%
Antiaging Quantum Living Inc.
MTNOY8.080.08
+1.00%
MTN Group Ltd.
AUMC0.48N/A
N/A
AURYN Mining Corporation
FBGI0.01N/A
N/A
Foodbase Group Inc.
DRTGF24.00-0.06
-0.25%
JET2 PLC

SXOOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SXOOF and NEXA have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SXOOF and NEXA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SXOOF
1D Price
Change %
SXOOF100%
+6.31%
NEXA - SXOOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
BMTLF - SXOOF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRLZF - SXOOF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLGRF - SXOOF
11%
Poorly correlated
-5.02%
TCKRF - SXOOF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More