Advertisement
SYHBF vs TLGRF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SYHBF is a Hold and TLGRF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SYHBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTLGRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SYHBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TLGRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SYHBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLGRF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SYHBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TLGRF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
SYHBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.26% price change this week, while TLGRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +8.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.83%.
Reported Earning Dates
SYHBF is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.20% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| SYHBF | TLGRF | SYHBF / TLGRF | |
| Capitalization | 42.3M | 320M | 13% |
| EBITDA | -4.71M | -35.21M | 13% |
| Gain YTD | -5.503 | 19.740 | -28% |
| P/E Ratio | 53.76 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 113K | - |
| Total Cash | 6.8M | 5.08M | 134% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 207K | - |
SYHBF | TLGRF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SYHBF's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as TLGRF (88). This means that SYHBF’s stock grew similarly to TLGRF’s over the last 12 months.
SYHBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as TLGRF (100). This means that SYHBF’s stock grew similarly to TLGRF’s over the last 12 months.
SYHBF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as TLGRF (96). This means that SYHBF’s stock grew similarly to TLGRF’s over the last 12 months.
TLGRF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SYHBF (79). This means that TLGRF’s stock grew similarly to SYHBF’s over the last 12 months.
TLGRF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SYHBF (100). This means that TLGRF’s stock grew similarly to SYHBF’s over the last 12 months.
| SYHBF | TLGRF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 13 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 66% |
Advertisement
SYHBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SYHBF has been loosely correlated with DNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SYHBF jumps, then DNN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SYHBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SYHBF | 100% | -0.94% | ||
| DNN - SYHBF | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| UUUU - SYHBF | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| NXE - SYHBF | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| UEC - SYHBF | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| ISOU - SYHBF | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
More | ||||
TLGRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TLGRF and BBBMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLGRF and BBBMF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TLGRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLGRF | 100% | -1.71% | ||
| BBBMF - TLGRF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PLL - TLGRF | 21% Poorly correlated | -5.24% | ||
| ATCMF - TLGRF | 21% Poorly correlated | +4.35% | ||
| LTSRF - TLGRF | 20% Poorly correlated | +6.26% | ||
| SYHBF - TLGRF | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
More | ||||