SZGPY
Price
$2.53
Change
+$0.04 (+1.61%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.44B
WEBC
Price
$186.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
159.74M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SZGPY vs WEBC

Header iconSZGPY vs WEBC Comparison
Open Charts SZGPY vs WEBCBanner chart's image
Salzgitter AG
Price$2.53
Change+$0.04 (+1.61%)
Volume$117
Capitalization1.44B
Webco Industries
Price$186.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6
Capitalization159.74M
SZGPY vs WEBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SZGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WEBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SZGPY vs. WEBC commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SZGPY is a Hold and WEBC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (SZGPY: $2.53 vs. WEBC: $186.00)
Brand notoriety: SZGPY and WEBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SZGPY: 5% vs. WEBC: 30%
Market capitalization -- SZGPY: $1.44B vs. WEBC: $159.74M
SZGPY [@Steel] is valued at $1.44B. WEBC’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $159.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $33.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SZGPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWEBC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SZGPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WEBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SZGPY is a better buy in the long-term than WEBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SZGPY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WEBC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SZGPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WEBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WEBC is a better buy in the short-term than SZGPY.

Price Growth

SZGPY (@Steel) experienced а -4.89% price change this week, while WEBC (@Steel) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+0.38% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SZGPY($1.44B) has a higher market cap than WEBC($160M). SZGPY has higher P/E ratio than WEBC: SZGPY (42.91) vs WEBC (5.60). SZGPY YTD gains are higher at: 62.267 vs. WEBC (14.815). SZGPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 429M vs. WEBC (52.6M). SZGPY has more cash in the bank: 892M vs. WEBC (6.19M). SZGPY has higher revenues than WEBC: SZGPY (9.66B) vs WEBC (687M).
SZGPYWEBCSZGPY / WEBC
Capitalization1.44B160M903%
EBITDA429M52.6M816%
Gain YTD62.26714.815420%
P/E Ratio42.915.60766%
Revenue9.66B687M1,407%
Total Cash892M6.19M14,413%
Total DebtN/A123M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SZGPY vs WEBC: Fundamental Ratings
SZGPY
WEBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5131
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7139
SMR RATING
1..100
9375
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4654
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
235
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SZGPY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WEBC (72). This means that SZGPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than WEBC’s over the last 12 months.

WEBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SZGPY (71). This means that WEBC’s stock grew similarly to SZGPY’s over the last 12 months.

WEBC's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as SZGPY (93). This means that WEBC’s stock grew similarly to SZGPY’s over the last 12 months.

SZGPY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as WEBC (54). This means that SZGPY’s stock grew similarly to WEBC’s over the last 12 months.

SZGPY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WEBC (35). This means that SZGPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than WEBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SZGPYWEBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SZGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WEBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGJQX18.26N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure R6
MNSQX23.27N/A
N/A
Invesco Main Street Small Cap R5
HBLAX14.93N/A
N/A
Hartford Balanced Income A
HWSIX75.61N/A
N/A
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value I
TRSYX16.19N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index

SZGPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SZGPY has been loosely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SZGPY jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SZGPY
1D Price
Change %
SZGPY100%
+1.61%
NUE - SZGPY
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
CMC - SZGPY
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
MT - SZGPY
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
GGB - SZGPY
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
CLF - SZGPY
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
More

WEBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WEBC and VLOUF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WEBC and VLOUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WEBC
1D Price
Change %
WEBC100%
N/A
VLOUF - WEBC
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USNZY - WEBC
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
VLOWY - WEBC
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.56%
HUDI - WEBC
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
SZGPY - WEBC
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
More