Advertisement
TAPM vs TREIF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TAPM is a StrongBuy and TREIF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TAPM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTREIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- TAPM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TREIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TAPM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TREIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- TAPM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TREIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
TAPM (@Electronics/Appliances) experienced а +8.86% price change this week, while TREIF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.77%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.21%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronics/Appliances (-2.44% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
@Services to the Health Industry (-2.30% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| TAPM | TREIF | TAPM / TREIF | |
| Capitalization | 1.01M | 36.2M | 3% |
| EBITDA | -1.74M | -8.76M | 20% |
| Gain YTD | -30.189 | 46.061 | -66% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.55M | 11K | 32,236% |
| Total Cash | 482K | 2.32M | 21% |
| Total Debt | 302K | 152K | 199% |
TAPM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| TAPM | TREIF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
Advertisement
TAPM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TAPM and LOQPF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAPM and LOQPF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAPM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAPM | 100% | N/A | ||
| LOQPF - TAPM | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KPLT - TAPM | 23% Poorly correlated | +9.36% | ||
| TREIF - TAPM | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BHAT - TAPM | 21% Poorly correlated | +4.20% | ||
| STLFF - TAPM | 8% Poorly correlated | +15.80% | ||
More | ||||
TREIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TREIF has been loosely correlated with HSTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TREIF jumps, then HSTM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TREIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TREIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HSTM - TREIF | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| AGYS - TREIF | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| LQWDF - TREIF | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
| NXLLF - TREIF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NEOJF - TREIF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||