Advertisement
TBIIF vs WACMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TBIIF is a Hold and WACMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TBIIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWACMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- TBIIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WACMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TBIIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WACMF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- TBIIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WACMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
| TBIIF | WACMF | TBIIF / WACMF | |
| Capitalization | 75.4M | 635M | 12% |
| EBITDA | 82M | 7.96B | 1% |
| Gain YTD | 64.454 | -6.148 | -1,048% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.91 | 18.30 | 65% |
| Revenue | 977M | 121B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 150M | 27.2B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 391M | 14B | 3% |
TBIIF | WACMF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WACMF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TBIIF (44). This means that WACMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TBIIF’s over the last 12 months.
WACMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TBIIF (100). This means that WACMF’s stock grew similarly to TBIIF’s over the last 12 months.
WACMF's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as TBIIF (87). This means that WACMF’s stock grew similarly to TBIIF’s over the last 12 months.
WACMF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as TBIIF (59). This means that WACMF’s stock grew similarly to TBIIF’s over the last 12 months.
WACMF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TBIIF (100). This means that WACMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TBIIF’s over the last 12 months.
| TBIIF | WACMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 30% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 26% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 20% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GGRUX | 14.93 | 0.11 | +0.74% |
| Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth R6 | |||
| MDBAX | 19.23 | 0.13 | +0.68% |
| BlackRock Large Cap Focus Value Inv A | |||
| AUICX | 34.40 | 0.22 | +0.64% |
| AB Equity Income C | |||
| FIONX | 16.65 | 0.08 | +0.48% |
| Fidelity SAI International Index | |||
| FNDMX | 13.46 | 0.03 | +0.22% |
| Fidelity Series Sust Non-US Dev Mrkt Fd | |||
TBIIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TBIIF and RCAT have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TBIIF and RCAT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TBIIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBIIF | 100% | +0.73% | ||
| RCAT - TBIIF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SEKEY - TBIIF | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.83% | ||
| LNVGY - TBIIF | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
| QUBT - TBIIF | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.35% | ||
| TSHTY - TBIIF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
WACMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WACMF and SEKEY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WACMF and SEKEY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WACMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WACMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SEKEY - WACMF | 11% Poorly correlated | +2.83% | ||
| TBIIF - WACMF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| TSHTY - WACMF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VRTK - WACMF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QUBT - WACMF | -3% Poorly correlated | +2.35% | ||
More | ||||