TCLAF
Price
$15.20
Change
-$0.54 (-3.43%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
856.56M
VKSC
Price
$0.57
Change
+$0.02 (+3.64%)
Updated
May 27 closing price
Capitalization
154.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

TCLAF vs VKSC

Header iconTCLAF vs VKSC Comparison
Open Charts TCLAF vs VKSCBanner chart's image
Transcontinental
Price$15.20
Change-$0.54 (-3.43%)
Volume$5.93K
Capitalization856.56M
Viskase Companies
Price$0.57
Change+$0.02 (+3.64%)
Volume$2.76K
Capitalization154.79M
TCLAF vs VKSC Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TCLAF vs. VKSC commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TCLAF is a Hold and VKSC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (TCLAF: $15.20 vs. VKSC: $0.57)
Brand notoriety: TCLAF and VKSC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TCLAF: 47% vs. VKSC: 107%
Market capitalization -- TCLAF: $856.56M vs. VKSC: $154.79M
TCLAF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $856.56M. VKSC’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $154.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TCLAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVKSC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • TCLAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VKSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TCLAF is a better buy in the long-term than VKSC.

Price Growth

TCLAF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -2.25% price change this week, while VKSC (@Containers/Packaging) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

VKSC is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (+1.43% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TCLAF($857M) has a higher market cap than VKSC($155M). TCLAF YTD gains are higher at: 29.864 vs. VKSC (-64.369). TCLAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 433M vs. VKSC (22M). VKSC has more cash in the bank: 46M vs. TCLAF (25.2M). VKSC has less debt than TCLAF: VKSC (273M) vs TCLAF (1.19B). TCLAF has higher revenues than VKSC: TCLAF (3B) vs VKSC (395M).
TCLAFVKSCTCLAF / VKSC
Capitalization857M155M553%
EBITDA433M22M1,968%
Gain YTD29.864-64.369-46%
P/E Ratio9.83N/A-
Revenue3B395M761%
Total Cash25.2M46M55%
Total Debt1.19B273M436%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TCLAF vs VKSC: Fundamental Ratings
TCLAF
VKSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3378
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58100
SMR RATING
1..100
749
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3896
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7391
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TCLAF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VKSC (70). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VKSC’s over the last 12 months.

TCLAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VKSC (100). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VKSC’s over the last 12 months.

VKSC's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCLAF (74). This means that VKSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCLAF’s over the last 12 months.

TCLAF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VKSC (96). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VKSC’s over the last 12 months.

TCLAF's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as VKSC (91). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to VKSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRDM27.761.25
+4.72%
Iridium Communications
PSTV0.330.01
+2.04%
Plus Therapeutics
PBYI3.720.07
+1.92%
Puma Biotechnology
EXPD112.361.21
+1.09%
Expeditors International of Washington
HSTM28.530.23
+0.81%
HealthStream

TCLAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCLAF and SEE have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCLAF and SEE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCLAF
1D Price
Change %
TCLAF100%
-3.43%
SEE - TCLAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
OI - TCLAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.79%
HOYFF - TCLAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUMXF - TCLAF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
RPKIF - TCLAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VKSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VKSC and TCLAF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VKSC and TCLAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VKSC
1D Price
Change %
VKSC100%
N/A
TCLAF - VKSC
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
SW - VKSC
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
SUMXF - VKSC
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
MNHFF - VKSC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TZPC - VKSC
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More