TCLAF
Price
$14.72
Change
-$0.14 (-0.94%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
856.56M
WIPKF
Price
$33.40
Change
+$0.64 (+1.95%)
Updated
Jul 8 closing price
Capitalization
1.99B
Interact to see
Advertisement

TCLAF vs WIPKF

Header iconTCLAF vs WIPKF Comparison
Open Charts TCLAF vs WIPKFBanner chart's image
Transcontinental
Price$14.72
Change-$0.14 (-0.94%)
Volume$8.9K
Capitalization856.56M
Winpak
Price$33.40
Change+$0.64 (+1.95%)
Volume$2.61K
Capitalization1.99B
TCLAF vs WIPKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TCLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WIPKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TCLAF vs. WIPKF commentary
Jul 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TCLAF is a Hold and WIPKF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 19, 2025
Stock price -- (TCLAF: $14.72 vs. WIPKF: $33.40)
Brand notoriety: TCLAF and WIPKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TCLAF: 17% vs. WIPKF: 38%
Market capitalization -- TCLAF: $856.56M vs. WIPKF: $1.99B
TCLAF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $856.56M. WIPKF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $1.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TCLAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWIPKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TCLAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WIPKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TCLAF is a better buy in the long-term than WIPKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TCLAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WIPKF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TCLAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WIPKF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both TCLAF and WIPKF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

TCLAF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -2.39% price change this week, while WIPKF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-1.15% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WIPKF($1.99B) has a higher market cap than TCLAF($857M). WIPKF has higher P/E ratio than TCLAF: WIPKF (14.35) vs TCLAF (9.83). TCLAF YTD gains are higher at: 25.763 vs. WIPKF (-0.003). TCLAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 433M vs. WIPKF (239M). WIPKF has more cash in the bank: 455M vs. TCLAF (25.2M). WIPKF has less debt than TCLAF: WIPKF (12.5M) vs TCLAF (1.19B). TCLAF has higher revenues than WIPKF: TCLAF (3B) vs WIPKF (1.19B).
TCLAFWIPKFTCLAF / WIPKF
Capitalization857M1.99B43%
EBITDA433M239M181%
Gain YTD25.763-0.003-857,678%
P/E Ratio9.8314.3569%
Revenue3B1.19B253%
Total Cash25.2M455M6%
Total Debt1.19B12.5M9,512%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TCLAF vs WIPKF: Fundamental Ratings
TCLAF
WIPKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8740
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71100
SMR RATING
1..100
7065
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4451
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8952
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TCLAF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WIPKF (89). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew significantly faster than WIPKF’s over the last 12 months.

TCLAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as WIPKF (100). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to WIPKF’s over the last 12 months.

WIPKF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as TCLAF (70). This means that WIPKF’s stock grew similarly to TCLAF’s over the last 12 months.

TCLAF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as WIPKF (51). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to WIPKF’s over the last 12 months.

WIPKF's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCLAF (89). This means that WIPKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCLAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TCLAFWIPKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TCLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WIPKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CIVGX19.430.17
+0.88%
American Funds International Vntg 529-F2
TIBIX30.35N/A
N/A
Thornburg Investment Income Builder I
GFVIX15.78N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Focused Value Inv
HLEZX18.66N/A
N/A
Harding Loevner Instl Emerg Mkts Z
PGRQX20.31N/A
N/A
PGIM Global Real Estate R6

TCLAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCLAF and SEE have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCLAF and SEE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCLAF
1D Price
Change %
TCLAF100%
-0.94%
SEE - TCLAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
OI - TCLAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
HOYFF - TCLAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUMXF - TCLAF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RPKIF - TCLAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WIPKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WIPKF and SUMXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WIPKF and SUMXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WIPKF
1D Price
Change %
WIPKF100%
N/A
SUMXF - WIPKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RPKIF - WIPKF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCLAF - WIPKF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
SW - WIPKF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
MNHFF - WIPKF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More