Advertisement
TCLHF vs XIACY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TCLHF is a Hold and XIACY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TCLHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXIACY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- TCLHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- XIACY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TCLHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XIACY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- TCLHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- XIACY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
TCLHF (@Electronics/Appliances) experienced а -12.77% price change this week, while XIACY (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was +0.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was +3.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.62%.
Reported Earning Dates
XIACY is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronics/Appliances (+3.99% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| TCLHF | XIACY | TCLHF / XIACY | |
| Capitalization | 1.27B | 39.4B | 3% |
| EBITDA | 2.96B | 8.76B | 34% |
| Gain YTD | 46.050 | 67.292 | 68% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.98 | 37.59 | 58% |
| Revenue | 68.7B | 266B | 26% |
| Total Cash | 11.1B | 71.2B | 16% |
| Total Debt | 7.48B | 22.5B | 33% |
TCLHF | XIACY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TCLHF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for XIACY (86). This means that TCLHF’s stock grew significantly faster than XIACY’s over the last 12 months.
XIACY's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as TCLHF (41). This means that XIACY’s stock grew similarly to TCLHF’s over the last 12 months.
XIACY's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as TCLHF (87). This means that XIACY’s stock grew similarly to TCLHF’s over the last 12 months.
XIACY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as TCLHF (38). This means that XIACY’s stock grew similarly to TCLHF’s over the last 12 months.
XIACY's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TCLHF (82). This means that XIACY’s stock grew significantly faster than TCLHF’s over the last 12 months.
| TCLHF | XIACY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 73% | 10 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 77% |
Advertisement
TCLHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TCLHF and TKLS have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCLHF and TKLS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TCLHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCLHF | 100% | -15.28% | ||
| TKLS - TCLHF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RIME - TCLHF | 1% Poorly correlated | -3.35% | ||
| XIACY - TCLHF | 1% Poorly correlated | -1.46% | ||
| SWDHF - TCLHF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNCPF - TCLHF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
XIACY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XIACY has been closely correlated with XIACF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XIACY jumps, then XIACF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XIACY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XIACY | 100% | -1.46% | ||
| XIACF - XIACY | 87% Closely correlated | -1.28% | ||
| GPRO - XIACY | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.72% | ||
| LPL - XIACY | 22% Poorly correlated | +6.69% | ||
| ZEPP - XIACY | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.94% | ||
| SNEJF - XIACY | 17% Poorly correlated | -8.08% | ||
More | ||||