TCYSF vs TMICY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TCYSF is a Hold and TMICY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TCYSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTMICY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- TCYSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TMICY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
TCYSF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.93% price change this week, while TMICY (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.
Reported Earning Dates
TMICY is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| TCYSF | TMICY | TCYSF / TMICY | |
| Capitalization | 300M | 6.47B | 5% |
| EBITDA | 7.99M | 65.3B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 27.552 | -2.323 | -1,186% |
| P/E Ratio | 208.33 | 33.11 | 629% |
| Revenue | 152M | 232B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 37.1M | 231B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 2.91M | N/A | - |
TCYSF | TMICY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 63 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 15 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TMICY's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TCYSF (91). This means that TMICY’s stock grew significantly faster than TCYSF’s over the last 12 months.
TCYSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as TMICY (63). This means that TCYSF’s stock grew similarly to TMICY’s over the last 12 months.
TMICY's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as TCYSF (84). This means that TMICY’s stock grew similarly to TCYSF’s over the last 12 months.
TCYSF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as TMICY (55). This means that TCYSF’s stock grew similarly to TMICY’s over the last 12 months.
TCYSF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TMICY (95). This means that TCYSF’s stock grew significantly faster than TMICY’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
TCYSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TCYSF and MARK have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCYSF and MARK's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TCYSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCYSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MARK - TCYSF | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.09% | ||
| LKRY - TCYSF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TMICY - TCYSF | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
| SQNXF - TCYSF | 7% Poorly correlated | -6.46% | ||
| UBSFF - TCYSF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TMICY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMICY has been loosely correlated with DBX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMICY jumps, then DBX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMICY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMICY | 100% | -1.16% | ||
| DBX - TMICY | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| NTDOY - TMICY | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| DUOL - TMICY | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.73% | ||
| AFRM - TMICY | 31% Poorly correlated | +5.53% | ||
| DCBO - TMICY | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.33% | ||
More | ||||