TCYSF
Price
$30.80
Change
-$0.25 (-0.81%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
299.57M
UBSFF
Price
$11.63
Change
-$0.36 (-3.01%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
4.21B
Ad is loading...

TCYSF vs UBSFF

Header iconTCYSF vs UBSFF Comparison
Open Charts TCYSF vs UBSFFBanner chart's image
Tecsys
Price$30.80
Change-$0.25 (-0.81%)
Volume$200
Capitalization299.57M
UbiSoft Entertainment
Price$11.63
Change-$0.36 (-3.01%)
Volume$1.25K
Capitalization4.21B
TCYSF vs UBSFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
TCYSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TCYSF vs. UBSFF commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TCYSF is a Hold and UBSFF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (TCYSF: $30.80 vs. UBSFF: $11.63)
Brand notoriety: TCYSF and UBSFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TCYSF: 47% vs. UBSFF: 142%
Market capitalization -- TCYSF: $299.57M vs. UBSFF: $4.21B
TCYSF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $299.57M. UBSFF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TCYSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUBSFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TCYSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UBSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBSFF is a better buy in the long-term than TCYSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TCYSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBSFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TCYSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UBSFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TCYSF is a better buy in the short-term than UBSFF.

Price Growth

TCYSF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UBSFF (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

UBSFF is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.54% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBSFF($4.21B) has a higher market cap than TCYSF($300M). TCYSF has higher P/E ratio than UBSFF: TCYSF (208.33) vs UBSFF (40.32). TCYSF YTD gains are higher at: -7.444 vs. UBSFF (-13.052). UBSFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 899M vs. TCYSF (7.99M). UBSFF has more cash in the bank: 1.53B vs. TCYSF (37.1M). TCYSF has less debt than UBSFF: TCYSF (2.91M) vs UBSFF (2.2B). UBSFF has higher revenues than TCYSF: UBSFF (2.11B) vs TCYSF (152M).
TCYSFUBSFFTCYSF / UBSFF
Capitalization300M4.21B7%
EBITDA7.99M899M1%
Gain YTD-7.444-13.05257%
P/E Ratio208.3340.32517%
Revenue152M2.11B7%
Total Cash37.1M1.53B2%
Total Debt2.91M2.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TCYSF vs UBSFF: Fundamental Ratings
TCYSF
UBSFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2866
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59100
SMR RATING
1..100
8494
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5388
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5895
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a31

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UBSFF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCYSF (87). This means that UBSFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCYSF’s over the last 12 months.

TCYSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBSFF (100). This means that TCYSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBSFF’s over the last 12 months.

TCYSF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as UBSFF (94). This means that TCYSF’s stock grew similarly to UBSFF’s over the last 12 months.

TCYSF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBSFF (88). This means that TCYSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBSFF’s over the last 12 months.

TCYSF's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBSFF (95). This means that TCYSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBSFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TCYSFUBSFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
55%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
50%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TCYSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTSH82.761.57
+1.93%
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp
OGN15.970.13
+0.82%
Organon & Co
PZZA39.080.21
+0.54%
Papa John's International
FISI27.16-0.03
-0.11%
Financial Institutions
ANTX1.17-0.01
-0.85%
AN2 Therapeutics

TCYSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCYSF and MARK have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCYSF and MARK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCYSF
1D Price
Change %
TCYSF100%
N/A
MARK - TCYSF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
LKRY - TCYSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMICY - TCYSF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
SQNXF - TCYSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UBSFF - TCYSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.00%
More

UBSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UBSFF and MTHRY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UBSFF and MTHRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBSFF
1D Price
Change %
UBSFF100%
-3.00%
MTHRY - UBSFF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
GXAI - UBSFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.57%
FRGT - UBSFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
VSMR - UBSFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMOAF - UBSFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More