Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TEDSX vs WILCX
TEDSX vs WILCX Comparison
Open Charts TEDSX vs WILCX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.44
Change+$0.53 (+1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.28B
Wasatch Global Value Institutional
Price$10.58
Change+$0.08 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.09M
TEDSX vs WILCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TEDSX vs. WILCX commentary
Jul 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TEDSX is a Buy and WILCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.28B vs. WILCX (137M). WILCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: WILCX (2.60) vs TEDSX (0.88). TEDSX was incepted earlier than WILCX: TEDSX (33 years) vs WILCX (13 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than WILCX (1.14). TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. WILCX (25.00). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WILCX: TEDSX (1000) vs WILCX (100000). WILCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.36 vs. TEDSX (2.48). WILCX return over 5 years is better than : 82.97 vs. TEDSX (35.01).
| TEDSX | WILCX | TEDSX / WILCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.95 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.14 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.680 | 20.067 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.28B | 137M | 6,777% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 2.60 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.48 | 16.36 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.81 | 33.23 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.01 | 82.97 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.06 | 36.06 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers