Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TEDSX vs WILCX
TEDSX vs WILCX Comparison
Open Charts TEDSX vs WILCX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.68
Change-$0.15 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
Wasatch Global Value Institutional
Price$10.95
Change-$0.05 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets140.75M
TEDSX vs WILCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TEDSX vs. WILCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TEDSX is a Hold and WILCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.13B vs. WILCX (141M). WILCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: WILCX (2.29) vs TEDSX (0.75). TEDSX was incepted earlier than WILCX: TEDSX (33 years) vs WILCX (14 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than WILCX (1.14). TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. WILCX (25.00). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WILCX: TEDSX (1000) vs WILCX (100000). WILCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.14 vs. TEDSX (1.97). WILCX return over 5 years is better than : 65.43 vs. TEDSX (22.13).
| TEDSX | WILCX | TEDSX / WILCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.95 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.14 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.395 | 24.802 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.13B | 141M | 6,478% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 2.29 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.97 | 13.14 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.16 | 29.30 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.13 | 65.43 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.90 | 44.55 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement