Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TEDSX vs WILCX
TEDSX vs WILCX Comparison
Open Charts TEDSX vs WILCX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.66
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.38B
Wasatch Global Value Institutional
Price$10.74
Change+$0.05 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.85M
TEDSX vs WILCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TEDSX vs. WILCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TEDSX is a Buy and WILCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.38B vs. WILCX (138M). WILCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: WILCX (2.52) vs TEDSX (0.86). TEDSX was incepted earlier than WILCX: TEDSX (33 years) vs WILCX (14 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than WILCX (1.14). TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. WILCX (25.00). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WILCX: TEDSX (1000) vs WILCX (100000). WILCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.33 vs. TEDSX (3.02). WILCX return over 5 years is better than : 79.49 vs. TEDSX (34.34).
| TEDSX | WILCX | TEDSX / WILCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.95 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.14 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.245 | 21.883 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.38B | 138M | 6,797% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 2.52 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.02 | 10.33 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.44 | 36.34 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.34 | 79.49 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.63 | 47.37 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement