Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TFCGX vs WCMLX
TFCGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts TFCGX vs WCMLX
Taylor Frigon Core Growth
Price$21.42
Change+$0.30 (+1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.23M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.00
Change+$0.08 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.19M
TFCGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TFCGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TFCGX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMLX has more cash in the bank: 44.2M vs. TFCGX (32.2M). TFCGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . TFCGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: TFCGX (9 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than TFCGX (1.45). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. TFCGX (30.28). TFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: TFCGX (5000) vs WCMLX (100000). TFCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.30 vs. WCMLX (-0.21). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 3.70 vs. TFCGX (-15.17).
| TFCGX | WCMLX | TFCGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.99 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.79 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.182 | 8.865 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 100000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.2M | 44.2M | 73% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.30 | -0.21 | -2,948% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.52 | 28.68 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.17 | 3.70 | -410% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |