Ad is loading...
TFCGX vs WCMLX
TFCGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts TFCGX vs WCMLX
Taylor Frigon Core Growth
Price$16.41
Change+$0.63 (+3.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.91M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.28
Change+$0.27 (+2.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.35M
TFCGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TFCGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TFCGX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMLX has more cash in the bank: 39.3M vs. TFCGX (24.9M). TFCGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . TFCGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: TFCGX (8 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than TFCGX (1.45). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. TFCGX (30.28). TFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: TFCGX (5000) vs WCMLX (100000). TFCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.51 vs. WCMLX (-10.85). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 25.40 vs. TFCGX (7.20).
| TFCGX | WCMLX | TFCGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.99 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.86 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.303 | -14.386 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 100000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.9M | 39.3M | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.51 | -10.85 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.66 | -5.33 | 275% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.20 | 25.40 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...