Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
THGCX vs VFWPX
THGCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts THGCX vs VFWPX
Thornburg International Equity C
Price$26.31
Change-$0.16 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.13B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$142.93
Change-$0.24 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.03B
THGCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
THGCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is THGCX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68B vs. THGCX (4.13B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than THGCX: VFWPX (2.76) vs THGCX (0.70). THGCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: THGCX (27 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). THGCX (2.17) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). THGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.13 vs. VFWPX (5.00). THGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: THGCX (5000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.82 vs. THGCX (15.27). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 42.45 vs. THGCX (29.79).
| THGCX | VFWPX | THGCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.03 | 7,233% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.03 | 7,233% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.754 | 19.900 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.13B | 68B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 2.76 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.27 | 17.82 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.44 | 40.91 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.79 | 42.45 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.60 | 53.89 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement