Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
THGCX vs VFWPX
THGCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts THGCX vs VFWPX
Thornburg International Equity C
Price$26.66
Change-$0.17 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.34B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$146.94
Change-$0.85 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
THGCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
THGCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is THGCX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. THGCX (4.34B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than THGCX: VFWPX (2.68) vs THGCX (0.69). THGCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: THGCX (27 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). THGCX (2.17) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). THGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.13 vs. VFWPX (5.00). THGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: THGCX (5000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.14 vs. THGCX (11.50). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 47.67 vs. THGCX (29.47).
| THGCX | VFWPX | THGCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.03 | 7,233% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.03 | 7,233% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.199 | 23.932 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.34B | 71.3B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 2.68 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.50 | 15.14 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.43 | 63.23 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 47.67 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.43 | 81.43 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement