Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
THGCX vs VFWPX
THGCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts THGCX vs VFWPX
Thornburg International Equity C
Price$25.31
Change-$0.29 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.82B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$137.92
Change-$1.89 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.25B
THGCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
THGCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is THGCX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 65.3B vs. THGCX (3.82B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than THGCX: VFWPX (2.83) vs THGCX (0.72). THGCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: THGCX (27 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). THGCX (2.17) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). THGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.13 vs. VFWPX (5.00). THGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: THGCX (5000) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.63 vs. THGCX (11.76). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 44.28 vs. THGCX (36.41).
| THGCX | VFWPX | THGCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.03 | 7,233% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 0.03 | 7,233% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.050 | 15.308 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.82B | 65.3B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 2.83 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.76 | 12.63 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.38 | 34.78 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.41 | 44.28 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.26 | 42.92 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement