TIAOF
Price
$0.53
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
11.12B
TRAGF
Price
$0.73
Change
-$0.27 (-27.00%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
13.91M
Interact to see
Advertisement

TIAOF vs TRAGF

Header iconTIAOF vs TRAGF Comparison
Open Charts TIAOF vs TRAGFBanner chart's image
Telecom Italia S.p.A
Price$0.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$346
Capitalization11.12B
Terago
Price$0.73
Change-$0.27 (-27.00%)
Volume$1.23K
Capitalization13.91M
TIAOF vs TRAGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TIAOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TIAOF vs. TRAGF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TIAOF is a Hold and TRAGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (TIAOF: $0.53 vs. TRAGF: $0.73)
Brand notoriety: TIAOF and TRAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TIAOF: 0% vs. TRAGF: 182%
Market capitalization -- TIAOF: $11.12B vs. TRAGF: $13.91M
TIAOF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $11.12B. TRAGF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $13.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $267.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TIAOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRAGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TIAOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TIAOF is a better buy in the long-term than TRAGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TIAOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRAGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TIAOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TRAGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TIAOF is a better buy in the short-term than TRAGF.

Price Growth

TIAOF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRAGF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-1.09% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TIAOF($11.1B) has a higher market cap than TRAGF($13.9M). TIAOF YTD gains are higher at: 110.883 vs. TRAGF (-48.085). TIAOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.16B vs. TRAGF (3.08M). TIAOF has more cash in the bank: 2.88B vs. TRAGF (1.93M). TRAGF has less debt than TIAOF: TRAGF (46.6M) vs TIAOF (13.4B). TIAOF has higher revenues than TRAGF: TIAOF (14.4B) vs TRAGF (25.9M).
TIAOFTRAGFTIAOF / TRAGF
Capitalization11.1B13.9M79,856%
EBITDA4.16B3.08M134,804%
Gain YTD110.883-48.085-231%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue14.4B25.9M55,598%
Total Cash2.88B1.93M149,688%
Total Debt13.4B46.6M28,755%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TIAOF vs TRAGF: Fundamental Ratings
TIAOF
TRAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9340
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
92100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4090
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
70100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TIAOF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRAGF (89). This means that TIAOF’s stock grew significantly faster than TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TIAOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (100). This means that TIAOF’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TIAOF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (100). This means that TIAOF’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TIAOF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRAGF (90). This means that TIAOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TIAOF's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (100). This means that TIAOF’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TIAOFTRAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TIAOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARRY8.170.20
+2.51%
Array Technologies
REZI40.780.26
+0.64%
Resideo Technologies
ISPO3.000.01
+0.33%
Inspirato
SYK368.57-2.65
-0.71%
Stryker Corp
LPTH6.50-0.36
-5.25%
LightPath Technologies

TIAOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TIAOF and CLCMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TIAOF and CLCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TIAOF
1D Price
Change %
TIAOF100%
N/A
CLCMF - TIAOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIIAY - TIAOF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIAIY - TIAOF
17%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
TLSNF - TIAOF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRAGF - TIAOF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TRAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRAGF and TRKNY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRAGF and TRKNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRAGF
1D Price
Change %
TRAGF100%
N/A
TRKNY - TRAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIAJF - TRAGF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLSNF - TRAGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLTZF - TRAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIIAY - TRAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More