TIAOF
Price
$0.27
Change
+$0.01 (+3.85%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
TRAGF
Price
$1.41
Change
-$0.56 (-28.43%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Ad is loading...

TIAOF vs TRAGF

Header iconTIAOF vs TRAGF Comparison
Open Charts TIAOF vs TRAGFBanner chart's image
Telecom Italia S.p.A
Price$0.27
Change+$0.01 (+3.85%)
Volume$660
CapitalizationN/A
Terago
Price$1.41
Change-$0.56 (-28.43%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
TIAOF vs TRAGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
TIAOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TIAOF vs. TRAGF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TIAOF is a Buy and TRAGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (TIAOF: $0.27 vs. TRAGF: $1.41)
Brand notoriety: TIAOF and TRAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TIAOF: 9% vs. TRAGF: 100%
Market capitalization -- TIAOF: $6.09B vs. TRAGF: $31.41M
TIAOF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $6.09B. TRAGF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $31.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TIAOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRAGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TIAOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TIAOF is a better buy in the long-term than TRAGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TIAOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRAGF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TIAOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TRAGF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRAGF is a better buy in the short-term than TIAOF.

Price Growth

TIAOF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +12.48% price change this week, while TRAGF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +83.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (-1.17% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TIAOF($6.09B) has a higher market cap than TRAGF($31.4M). TRAGF YTD gains are higher at: 49.444 vs. TIAOF (-20.364). TIAOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.21B vs. TRAGF (1.07M). TIAOF has more cash in the bank: 4.34B vs. TRAGF (2.92M). TRAGF has less debt than TIAOF: TRAGF (19.9M) vs TIAOF (5.53B). TIAOF has higher revenues than TRAGF: TIAOF (16B) vs TRAGF (26.2M).
TIAOFTRAGFTIAOF / TRAGF
Capitalization6.09B31.4M19,408%
EBITDA5.21B1.07M487,371%
Gain YTD-20.36449.444-41%
P/E Ratio1.07N/A-
Revenue16B26.2M61,069%
Total Cash4.34B2.92M148,596%
Total Debt5.53B19.9M27,779%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TIAOF vs TRAGF: Fundamental Ratings
TIAOF
TRAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3436
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9198
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
81100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a12

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TIAOF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRAGF (87). This means that TIAOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TIAOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (100). This means that TIAOF’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TIAOF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (98). This means that TIAOF’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TIAOF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (52). This means that TIAOF’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TIAOF's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (100). This means that TIAOF’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TIAOFTRAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TIAOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PST24.200.34
+1.41%
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury
RDIV49.69-0.25
-0.50%
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
VDC214.96-3.79
-1.73%
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
BKF36.50-0.87
-2.33%
iShares MSCI BIC ETF
VSLU36.65-1.06
-2.81%
Applied Finance Valuation LgCp ETF

TIAOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TIAOF and CLCMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TIAOF and CLCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TIAOF
1D Price
Change %
TIAOF100%
N/A
CLCMF - TIAOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIIAY - TIAOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.53%
TIAIY - TIAOF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
TLSNF - TIAOF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRAGF - TIAOF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TRAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRAGF and TRKNY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRAGF and TRKNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRAGF
1D Price
Change %
TRAGF100%
N/A
TRKNY - TRAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIAJF - TRAGF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLSNF - TRAGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLTZF - TRAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIIAY - TRAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.53%
More