Ad is loading...
TIAOF
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
TRAGF
Price
$1.41
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Ad is loading...

TIAOF vs TRAGF

Header iconTIAOF vs TRAGF Comparison
Open Charts TIAOF vs TRAGFBanner chart's image
Telecom Italia S.p.A
Price$0.24
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$16.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Terago
Price$1.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
TIAOF vs TRAGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TIAOF vs. TRAGF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TIAOF is a Hold and TRAGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (TIAOF: $0.24 vs. TRAGF: $1.41)
Brand notoriety: TIAOF and TRAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TIAOF: 416% vs. TRAGF: 100%
Market capitalization -- TIAOF: $6.09B vs. TRAGF: $31.41M
TIAOF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $6.09B. TRAGF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $31.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TIAOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRAGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TIAOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TIAOF is a better buy in the long-term than TRAGF.

Price Growth

TIAOF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -5.06% price change this week, while TRAGF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +9.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +62.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+9.09% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TIAOF($6.09B) has a higher market cap than TRAGF($31.4M). TRAGF YTD gains are higher at: 49.444 vs. TIAOF (-28.410). TIAOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.21B vs. TRAGF (1.07M). TIAOF has more cash in the bank: 4.34B vs. TRAGF (2.92M). TRAGF has less debt than TIAOF: TRAGF (19.9M) vs TIAOF (5.53B). TIAOF has higher revenues than TRAGF: TIAOF (16B) vs TRAGF (26.2M).
TIAOFTRAGFTIAOF / TRAGF
Capitalization6.09B31.4M19,408%
EBITDA5.21B1.07M487,371%
Gain YTD-28.41049.444-57%
P/E Ratio1.07N/A-
Revenue16B26.2M61,069%
Total Cash4.34B2.92M148,596%
Total Debt5.53B19.9M27,779%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TIAOF vs TRAGF: Fundamental Ratings
TIAOF
TRAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
82100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TIAOF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRAGF (88). This means that TIAOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TIAOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (100). This means that TIAOF’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TIAOF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (97). This means that TIAOF’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TRAGF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as TIAOF (58). This means that TRAGF’s stock grew similarly to TIAOF’s over the last 12 months.

TIAOF's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (100). This means that TIAOF’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QGRPX17.81N/A
N/A
UBS US Quality Growth At Rsnbl Prc P
FAZYX14.40-0.08
-0.55%
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income M
MMMMX45.56-0.51
-1.11%
Victory Integrity Discovery Member
DGLYX22.88-0.36
-1.55%
BNY Mellon Global Stock - Y
FDYNX136.08-3.52
-2.52%
Franklin DynaTech C

TIAOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TIAOF and CLCMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TIAOF and CLCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TIAOF
1D Price
Change %
TIAOF100%
N/A
CLCMF - TIAOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIIAY - TIAOF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIAIY - TIAOF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLSNF - TIAOF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRAGF - TIAOF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TRAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRAGF and TRKNY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRAGF and TRKNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRAGF
1D Price
Change %
TRAGF100%
N/A
TRKNY - TRAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIAJF - TRAGF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLSNF - TRAGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLTZF - TRAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIIAY - TRAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More