Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TINY vs XLK
TINY vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts TINY vs XLK
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
Price$43.83
Change-$0.24 (-0.54%)
Volume$293
Net Assets4.39M
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$250.77
Change-$0.30 (-0.12%)
Volume$6.1M
Net Assets78.82B
TINY vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TINY vs. XLK commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TINY is a Buy and XLK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 78.8B vs. TINY (4.4M). XLK has a higher annual dividend yield than TINY: XLK (8.217) vs TINY (-1.993). TINY was incepted earlier than XLK: TINY (4 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than TINY (0.58). TINY has a higher turnover XLK (39.00) vs XLK (39.00).
| TINY | XLK | TINY / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | -1.993 | 8.217 | -24% |
| Net Assets | 4.4M | 78.8B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.08 | 725% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 39.00 | 108% |
| Yield | 0.01 | 0.67 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| XLK | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
TINY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TINY has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TINY jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TINY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TINY | 100% | -0.54% | ||
| KLAC - TINY | 75% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| LRCX - TINY | 74% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| AMAT - TINY | 73% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| VECO - TINY | 73% Closely correlated | -3.30% | ||
| UCTT - TINY | 71% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 84% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| KLAC - XLK | 82% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| MPWR - XLK | 81% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| CDNS - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| AMAT - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||