Ad is loading...
TINY vs XLK
TINY vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts TINY vs XLK
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
Price$34.27
Change-$2.26 (-6.19%)
Volume$200
Net Assets4.09M
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$194.44
Change-$9.42 (-4.62%)
Volume$60.18K
Net Assets55.42B
TINY vs XLK Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TINY vs. XLK commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TINY is a Hold and XLK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 55.4B vs. TINY (4.09M). XLK has a higher annual dividend yield than TINY: XLK (-12.172) vs TINY (-18.335). TINY was incepted earlier than XLK: TINY (3 years) vs XLK (26 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than TINY (0.58). TINY has a higher turnover XLK (19.00) vs XLK (19.00).
| TINY | XLK | TINY / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | -18.335 | -12.172 | 151% |
| Net Assets | 4.09M | 55.4B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.08 | 725% |
| Turnover | 42.00 | 19.00 | 221% |
| Yield | 0.01 | 0.76 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| XLK | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
TINY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TINY has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TINY jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TINY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TINY | 100% | +13.12% | ||
| KLAC - TINY | 79% Closely correlated | +17.31% | ||
| LRCX - TINY | 78% Closely correlated | +18.02% | ||
| VECO - TINY | 78% Closely correlated | +12.97% | ||
| AMAT - TINY | 78% Closely correlated | +16.11% | ||
| ONTO - TINY | 77% Closely correlated | +26.30% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | +13.43% | ||
| KLAC - XLK | 82% Closely correlated | +17.31% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 82% Closely correlated | +18.02% | ||
| CDNS - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | +14.25% | ||
| AMAT - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | +16.11% | ||
| SNPS - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | +12.35% | ||
More | ||||