Ad is loading...
TKPHF
Price
$25.93
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
ZTS
Price
$175.14
Change
+$0.51 (+0.29%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
93 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

TKPHF vs ZTS

Header iconTKPHF vs ZTS Comparison
Open Charts TKPHF vs ZTSBanner chart's image
Takeda Pharmaceutical
Price$25.93
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50.21K
CapitalizationN/A
ZOETIS
Price$175.14
Change+$0.51 (+0.29%)
Volume$3.43M
CapitalizationN/A
TKPHF vs ZTS Comparison Chart
Loading...
ZTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TKPHF vs. ZTS commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TKPHF is a Hold and ZTS is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (TKPHF: $25.93 vs. ZTS: $175.14)
Brand notoriety: TKPHF: Not notable vs. ZTS: Notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TKPHF: 160% vs. ZTS: 163%
Market capitalization -- TKPHF: $47.94B vs. ZTS: $77.48B
TKPHF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $47.94B. ZTS’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $77.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TKPHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • TKPHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZTS is a better buy in the long-term than TKPHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ZTS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ZTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

TKPHF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -3.10% price change this week, while ZTS (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -0.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -5.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

ZTS is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-5.07% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZTS($77.5B) has a higher market cap than TKPHF($47.9B). ZTS has higher P/E ratio than TKPHF: ZTS (32.94) vs TKPHF (22.47). TKPHF YTD gains are higher at: -9.746 vs. ZTS (-10.384). TKPHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.15T vs. ZTS (3.67B). TKPHF has more cash in the bank: 369B vs. ZTS (2.04B). ZTS has less debt than TKPHF: ZTS (6.76B) vs TKPHF (4.75T). TKPHF has higher revenues than ZTS: TKPHF (4.11T) vs ZTS (8.54B).
TKPHFZTSTKPHF / ZTS
Capitalization47.9B77.5B62%
EBITDA1.15T3.67B31,451%
Gain YTD-9.746-10.38494%
P/E Ratio22.4732.9468%
Revenue4.11T8.54B48,151%
Total Cash369B2.04B18,097%
Total Debt4.75T6.76B70,274%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TKPHF vs ZTS: Fundamental Ratings
TKPHF
ZTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5074
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10055
SMR RATING
1..100
8421
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9174
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2985

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TKPHF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZTS (76) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry. This means that TKPHF’s stock grew significantly faster than ZTS’s over the last 12 months.

ZTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TKPHF (100) in the null industry. This means that ZTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TKPHF’s over the last 12 months.

ZTS's SMR Rating (21) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TKPHF (84) in the null industry. This means that ZTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TKPHF’s over the last 12 months.

ZTS's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is in the same range as TKPHF (73) in the null industry. This means that ZTS’s stock grew similarly to TKPHF’s over the last 12 months.

ZTS's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Pharmaceuticals Generic industry is in the same range as TKPHF (91) in the null industry. This means that ZTS’s stock grew similarly to TKPHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ZTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ZTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RJF160.680.53
+0.33%
Raymond James Financial
APLE15.50-0.09
-0.58%
Apple Hospitality REIT
EKSO0.75-0.01
-1.19%
Ekso Bionics Holdings
LAB1.58-0.12
-7.06%
Standard BioTools
PGEN0.82-0.06
-7.11%
Precigen

TKPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TKPHF and TAK have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TKPHF and TAK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TKPHF
1D Price
Change %
TKPHF100%
N/A
TAK - TKPHF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
TEVJF - TKPHF
17%
Poorly correlated
-8.21%
ZTS - TKPHF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
BHC - TKPHF
15%
Poorly correlated
-3.20%
QNTM - TKPHF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
More

ZTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZTS has been loosely correlated with SNDL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZTS jumps, then SNDL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZTS
1D Price
Change %
ZTS100%
+0.29%
SNDL - ZTS
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ACET - ZTS
31%
Poorly correlated
-9.82%
EVO - ZTS
27%
Poorly correlated
+6.67%
HLN - ZTS
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
ORGO - ZTS
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.62%
More