TLSNF
Price
$3.75
Change
+$0.07 (+1.90%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
14.89B
TRAGF
Price
$0.73
Change
-$0.27 (-27.00%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
14.68M
Interact to see
Advertisement

TLSNF vs TRAGF

Header iconTLSNF vs TRAGF Comparison
Open Charts TLSNF vs TRAGFBanner chart's image
Telia Company AB
Price$3.75
Change+$0.07 (+1.90%)
Volume$4.5K
Capitalization14.89B
Terago
Price$0.73
Change-$0.27 (-27.00%)
Volume$1.23K
Capitalization14.68M
TLSNF vs TRAGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TLSNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TLSNF vs. TRAGF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TLSNF is a Hold and TRAGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (TLSNF: $3.75 vs. TRAGF: $0.73)
Brand notoriety: TLSNF and TRAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TLSNF: 118% vs. TRAGF: 356%
Market capitalization -- TLSNF: $14.89B vs. TRAGF: $14.68M
TLSNF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $14.89B. TRAGF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $14.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $284.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TLSNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRAGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TLSNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TLSNF is a better buy in the long-term than TRAGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TLSNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRAGF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TLSNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TRAGF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TLSNF is a better buy in the short-term than TRAGF.

Price Growth

TLSNF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +1.90% price change this week, while TRAGF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-0.28% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TLSNF($14.9B) has a higher market cap than TRAGF($14.7M). TLSNF YTD gains are higher at: 31.119 vs. TRAGF (-48.085). TLSNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 31.1B vs. TRAGF (3.08M). TLSNF has more cash in the bank: 9.78B vs. TRAGF (1.93M). TRAGF has less debt than TLSNF: TRAGF (46.6M) vs TLSNF (90B). TLSNF has higher revenues than TRAGF: TLSNF (89.4B) vs TRAGF (25.9M).
TLSNFTRAGFTLSNF / TRAGF
Capitalization14.9B14.7M101,361%
EBITDA31.1B3.08M1,008,758%
Gain YTD31.119-48.085-65%
P/E Ratio25.99N/A-
Revenue89.4B25.9M345,174%
Total Cash9.78B1.93M507,840%
Total Debt90B46.6M193,133%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TLSNF vs TRAGF: Fundamental Ratings
TLSNF
TRAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8893
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
76100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5093
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TRAGF's Valuation (90) in the null industry is in the same range as TLSNF (94). This means that TRAGF’s stock grew similarly to TLSNF’s over the last 12 months.

TRAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TLSNF (100). This means that TRAGF’s stock grew similarly to TLSNF’s over the last 12 months.

TLSNF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (100). This means that TLSNF’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TLSNF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRAGF (93). This means that TLSNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TLSNF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (100). This means that TLSNF’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TLSNFTRAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TLSNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MHF7.340.32
+4.56%
Western Asset Municipal High Income Fund
FIAT3.270.09
+2.83%
YieldMax Short COIN Option Inc Strgy ETF
PJIO62.26N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison International Opps ETF
QLC75.37-0.18
-0.24%
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap ETF
IOO115.43-0.59
-0.51%
iShares Global 100 ETF

TLSNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLSNF has been loosely correlated with RCIAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLSNF jumps, then RCIAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLSNF
1D Price
Change %
TLSNF100%
N/A
RCIAF - TLSNF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PTTWF - TLSNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIAOF - TLSNF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRAGF - TLSNF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLSNY - TLSNF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
More

TRAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRAGF and TRKNY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRAGF and TRKNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRAGF
1D Price
Change %
TRAGF100%
N/A
TRKNY - TRAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
TIAJF - TRAGF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLSNF - TRAGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLTZF - TRAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIIAY - TRAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
More