TLTZF
Price
$14.10
Change
+$0.66 (+4.91%)
Updated
May 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.21B
TRAGF
Price
$1.00
Change
+$0.02 (+2.04%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
31.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

TLTZF vs TRAGF

Header iconTLTZF vs TRAGF Comparison
Open Charts TLTZF vs TRAGFBanner chart's image
Tele2 AB
Price$14.10
Change+$0.66 (+4.91%)
Volume$400
Capitalization5.21B
Terago
Price$1.00
Change+$0.02 (+2.04%)
Volume$100
Capitalization31.41M
TLTZF vs TRAGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TLTZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TLTZF vs. TRAGF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TLTZF is a Hold and TRAGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (TLTZF: $14.10 vs. TRAGF: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: TLTZF and TRAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TLTZF: 103% vs. TRAGF: 17%
Market capitalization -- TLTZF: $5.21B vs. TRAGF: $31.41M
TLTZF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $5.21B. TRAGF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $31.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TLTZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRAGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TLTZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TLTZF is a better buy in the long-term than TRAGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TLTZF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRAGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TLTZF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • TRAGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both TLTZF and TRAGF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

TLTZF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRAGF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +2.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.68% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TLTZF($5.21B) has a higher market cap than TRAGF($31.4M). TLTZF YTD gains are higher at: 22.609 vs. TRAGF (-29.078). TLTZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.19B vs. TRAGF (1.07M). TLTZF has more cash in the bank: 1.67B vs. TRAGF (2.92M). TRAGF has less debt than TLTZF: TRAGF (19.9M) vs TLTZF (33.1B). TLTZF has higher revenues than TRAGF: TLTZF (28.7B) vs TRAGF (26.2M).
TLTZFTRAGFTLTZF / TRAGF
Capitalization5.21B31.4M16,592%
EBITDA5.19B1.07M485,875%
Gain YTD22.609-29.078-78%
P/E Ratio20.20N/A-
Revenue28.7B26.2M109,542%
Total Cash1.67B2.92M57,192%
Total Debt33.1B19.9M166,332%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TLTZF vs TRAGF: Fundamental Ratings
TLTZF
TRAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4740
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82100
SMR RATING
1..100
5199
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4123

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TLTZF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRAGF (91). This means that TLTZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TLTZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (100). This means that TLTZF’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TLTZF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRAGF (99). This means that TLTZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TLTZF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as TRAGF (56). This means that TLTZF’s stock grew similarly to TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TLTZF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRAGF (100). This means that TLTZF’s stock grew significantly faster than TRAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TLTZFTRAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TLTZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RWMHX64.440.53
+0.83%
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
LICAX17.37N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Equity A
VAIGX23.15N/A
N/A
Vanguard Advice Select Intl Gr Admiral
QCGDX14.52N/A
N/A
Quantified Common Ground Investor
MMNGX19.13N/A
N/A
MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Y

TLTZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TLTZF and TTRAF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLTZF and TTRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLTZF
1D Price
Change %
TLTZF100%
N/A
TTRAF - TLTZF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLGPY - TLTZF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
TRAGF - TLTZF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIAOF - TLTZF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIAJF - TLTZF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TRAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRAGF and TRKNY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRAGF and TRKNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRAGF
1D Price
Change %
TRAGF100%
N/A
TRKNY - TRAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIAJF - TRAGF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLSNF - TRAGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLTZF - TRAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIIAY - TRAGF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
More