TMICF
Price
$67.53
Change
-$4.26 (-5.93%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
6.47B
URLOF
Price
$0.79
Change
+$0.01 (+1.28%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
11.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

TMICF vs URLOF

Header iconTMICF vs URLOF Comparison
Open Charts TMICF vs URLOFBanner chart's image
Trend Micro
Price$67.53
Change-$4.26 (-5.93%)
Volume$300
Capitalization6.47B
NameSilo Technologies
Price$0.79
Change+$0.01 (+1.28%)
Volume$41.25K
Capitalization11.06M
TMICF vs URLOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
URLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TMICF vs. URLOF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TMICF is a Hold and URLOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (TMICF: $67.53 vs. URLOF: $0.79)
Brand notoriety: TMICF and URLOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TMICF: 212% vs. URLOF: 83%
Market capitalization -- TMICF: $6.47B vs. URLOF: $11.06M
TMICF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $6.47B. URLOF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $11.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TMICF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileURLOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • TMICF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • URLOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, URLOF is a better buy in the long-term than TMICF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

URLOF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • URLOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

TMICF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +17.24% price change this week, while URLOF (@Packaged Software) price change was +11.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

TMICF is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMICF($6.47B) has a higher market cap than URLOF($11.1M). URLOF YTD gains are higher at: 114.120 vs. TMICF (17.240). TMICF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 65.3B vs. URLOF (-1.51M). TMICF has more cash in the bank: 231B vs. URLOF (451K). TMICF has higher revenues than URLOF: TMICF (232B) vs URLOF (46.2M).
TMICFURLOFTMICF / URLOF
Capitalization6.47B11.1M58,297%
EBITDA65.3B-1.51M-4,315,777%
Gain YTD17.240114.12015%
P/E Ratio34.48N/A-
Revenue232B46.2M502,165%
Total Cash231B451K51,219,512%
Total DebtN/A3.53M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TMICF vs URLOF: Fundamental Ratings
TMICF
URLOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9526
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5512
SMR RATING
1..100
6591
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4035
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
922
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TMICF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for URLOF (85). This means that TMICF’s stock grew significantly faster than URLOF’s over the last 12 months.

URLOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMICF (55). This means that URLOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMICF’s over the last 12 months.

TMICF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as URLOF (91). This means that TMICF’s stock grew similarly to URLOF’s over the last 12 months.

URLOF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as TMICF (40). This means that URLOF’s stock grew similarly to TMICF’s over the last 12 months.

URLOF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TMICF (92). This means that URLOF’s stock grew significantly faster than TMICF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
URLOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
URLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DAR38.310.99
+2.65%
Darling Ingredients
TOPS5.550.07
+1.28%
TOP Ships
EEX4.910.06
+1.24%
Emerald Holding
FSLY6.890.04
+0.58%
Fastly
MA545.81-3.89
-0.71%
Mastercard

TMICF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TMICF and IFBD have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMICF and IFBD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMICF
1D Price
Change %
TMICF100%
N/A
IFBD - TMICF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.38%
DCBO - TMICF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.50%
MANH - TMICF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
TMICY - TMICF
15%
Poorly correlated
+5.03%
URLOF - TMICF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
More

URLOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that URLOF and CFCI have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that URLOF and CFCI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To URLOF
1D Price
Change %
URLOF100%
+1.05%
CFCI - URLOF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNTMF - URLOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IGGGF - URLOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TEAM - URLOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
TMICF - URLOF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More