TMOAF
Price
$6.10
Change
+$0.90 (+17.31%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
UBSFF
Price
$10.17
Change
-$0.33 (-3.14%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
4.21B
Interact to see
Advertisement

TMOAF vs UBSFF

Header iconTMOAF vs UBSFF Comparison
Open Charts TMOAF vs UBSFFBanner chart's image
Tomtom
Price$6.10
Change+$0.90 (+17.31%)
Volume$168
Capitalization1.13B
UbiSoft Entertainment
Price$10.17
Change-$0.33 (-3.14%)
Volume$165
Capitalization4.21B
TMOAF vs UBSFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TMOAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TMOAF vs. UBSFF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TMOAF is a Hold and UBSFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (TMOAF: $6.10 vs. UBSFF: $10.17)
Brand notoriety: TMOAF and UBSFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TMOAF: 126% vs. UBSFF: 22%
Market capitalization -- TMOAF: $1.13B vs. UBSFF: $4.21B
TMOAF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.13B. UBSFF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TMOAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUBSFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TMOAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UBSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMOAF is a better buy in the long-term than UBSFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TMOAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBSFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TMOAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • UBSFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UBSFF is a better buy in the short-term than TMOAF.

Price Growth

TMOAF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UBSFF (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.28% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBSFF($4.21B) has a higher market cap than TMOAF($1.13B). TMOAF YTD gains are higher at: 9.221 vs. UBSFF (-23.934). UBSFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 899M vs. TMOAF (31.5M). UBSFF has more cash in the bank: 1.53B vs. TMOAF (316M). TMOAF has less debt than UBSFF: TMOAF (50.2M) vs UBSFF (2.2B). UBSFF has higher revenues than TMOAF: UBSFF (2.11B) vs TMOAF (573M).
TMOAFUBSFFTMOAF / UBSFF
Capitalization1.13B4.21B27%
EBITDA31.5M899M4%
Gain YTD9.221-23.934-39%
P/E RatioN/A40.32-
Revenue573M2.11B27%
Total Cash316M1.53B21%
Total Debt50.2M2.2B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TMOAF vs UBSFF: Fundamental Ratings
TMOAF
UBSFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4024
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9694
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4183
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10094
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UBSFF's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as TMOAF (67). This means that UBSFF’s stock grew similarly to TMOAF’s over the last 12 months.

UBSFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TMOAF (100). This means that UBSFF’s stock grew similarly to TMOAF’s over the last 12 months.

UBSFF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as TMOAF (96). This means that UBSFF’s stock grew similarly to TMOAF’s over the last 12 months.

TMOAF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBSFF (83). This means that TMOAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBSFF’s over the last 12 months.

UBSFF's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as TMOAF (100). This means that UBSFF’s stock grew similarly to TMOAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TMOAFUBSFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TMOAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSLAX61.140.03
+0.05%
American Funds SMALLCAP World R1
DIERX44.00N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon International Core Equity I
JSEZX38.88N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Small Cap Equity R2
GMPPX38.12N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value P
MAVKX14.08N/A
N/A
MoA Small Cap Value Fund

TMOAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMOAF has been loosely correlated with MTC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMOAF jumps, then MTC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMOAF
1D Price
Change %
TMOAF100%
N/A
MTC - TMOAF
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
SFSVF - TMOAF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VASO - TMOAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
TMSNY - TMOAF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
TMVWY - TMOAF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.85%
More

UBSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UBSFF and MTHRY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UBSFF and MTHRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBSFF
1D Price
Change %
UBSFF100%
-3.14%
MTHRY - UBSFF
26%
Poorly correlated
+12.00%
GXAI - UBSFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
FRGT - UBSFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.40%
VSMR - UBSFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMOAF - UBSFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More