Ad is loading...
TMVWF
Price
$12.55
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
ZS
Price
$201.46
Change
-$0.01 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
14 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

TMVWF vs ZS

Header iconTMVWF vs ZS Comparison
Open Charts TMVWF vs ZSBanner chart's image
TeamViewer SE
Price$12.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Zscaler
Price$201.46
Change-$0.01 (-0.00%)
Volume$11.41K
CapitalizationN/A
TMVWF vs ZS Comparison Chart
Loading...
ZS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TMVWF vs. ZS commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TMVWF is a Hold and ZS is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (TMVWF: $12.55 vs. ZS: $201.47)
Brand notoriety: TMVWF: Not notable vs. ZS: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TMVWF: 6% vs. ZS: 86%
Market capitalization -- TMVWF: $3B vs. ZS: $28.79B
TMVWF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3B. ZS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $28.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TMVWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TMVWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZS is a better buy in the long-term than TMVWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ZS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ZS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

TMVWF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZS (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

ZS is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZS($28.8B) has a higher market cap than TMVWF($3B). ZS (-9.068) and TMVWF (-9.351) have similar YTD gains . TMVWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 205M vs. ZS (-27.8M). ZS has more cash in the bank: 2.46B vs. TMVWF (87.5M). TMVWF has less debt than ZS: TMVWF (633M) vs ZS (1.23B). ZS has higher revenues than TMVWF: ZS (1.9B) vs TMVWF (583M).
TMVWFZSTMVWF / ZS
Capitalization3B28.8B10%
EBITDA205M-27.8M-738%
Gain YTD-9.351-9.068103%
P/E Ratio31.85N/A-
Revenue583M1.9B31%
Total Cash87.5M2.46B4%
Total Debt633M1.23B51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZS: Fundamental Ratings
ZS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
52
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
29

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ZS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ZS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UTPIX74.211.68
+2.32%
ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Inv
FSTCX55.780.10
+0.18%
Fidelity Select Telecommunications Port
PIGCX24.97-0.23
-0.91%
Putnam International Equity C
CIVHX16.66-0.16
-0.95%
American Funds International Vntg 529-F3
FIADX49.20-0.65
-1.30%
Fidelity Advisor International Discv I

TMVWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMVWF has been loosely correlated with PAYC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMVWF jumps, then PAYC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMVWF
1D Price
Change %
TMVWF100%
N/A
PAYC - TMVWF
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
LCHTF - TMVWF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CCRD - TMVWF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
ZS - TMVWF
33%
Loosely correlated
-3.37%
ASAN - TMVWF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.52%
More