TMVWF
Price
$7.05
Change
-$0.48 (-6.37%)
Updated
Nov 10 closing price
Capitalization
1.01B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZS
Price
$291.81
Change
-$1.30 (-0.44%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
46.19B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TMVWF vs ZS

Header iconTMVWF vs ZS Comparison
Open Charts TMVWF vs ZSBanner chart's image
TeamViewer SE
Price$7.05
Change-$0.48 (-6.37%)
Volume$900
Capitalization1.01B
Zscaler
Price$291.81
Change-$1.30 (-0.44%)
Volume$1.41M
Capitalization46.19B
TMVWF vs ZS Comparison Chart in %
TMVWF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TMVWF vs. ZS commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TMVWF is a Hold and ZS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (TMVWF: $7.05 vs. ZS: $291.81)
Brand notoriety: TMVWF: Not notable vs. ZS: Notable
TMVWF represents the Packaged Software, while ZS is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TMVWF: 28% vs. ZS: 107%
Market capitalization -- TMVWF: $1.01B vs. ZS: $46.19B
TMVWF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.01B. ZS’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $46.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $276.94B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.62T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.1B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TMVWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TMVWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both TMVWF and ZS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TMVWF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TMVWF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TMVWF is a better buy in the short-term than ZS.

Price Growth

TMVWF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZS (@Computer Communications) price change was -7.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -5.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.41%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -6.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

ZS is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-5.51% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (-6.62% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZS($46.2B) has a higher market cap than TMVWF($1.01B). ZS YTD gains are higher at: 61.748 vs. TMVWF (-33.305). TMVWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 250M vs. ZS (108M). ZS has more cash in the bank: 3.57B vs. TMVWF (37.3M). TMVWF has less debt than ZS: TMVWF (1.03B) vs ZS (1.8B). ZS has higher revenues than TMVWF: ZS (2.67B) vs TMVWF (731M).
TMVWFZSTMVWF / ZS
Capitalization1.01B46.2B2%
EBITDA250M108M231%
Gain YTD-33.30561.748-54%
P/E Ratio8.34N/A-
Revenue731M2.67B27%
Total Cash37.3M3.57B1%
Total Debt1.03B1.8B57%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZS: Fundamental Ratings
ZS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
76
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TMVWFZS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TMVWF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RLUEX12.690.05
+0.40%
Lazard US Equity Concentrated R6
NILIX14.83N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman International Sel I
TEDRX30.99N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R
FTINX12.67N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% I
VCGAX35.72N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I Systematic Core Fund

TMVWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMVWF has been loosely correlated with PAYC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMVWF jumps, then PAYC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMVWF
1D Price
Change %
TMVWF100%
N/A
PAYC - TMVWF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
LCHTF - TMVWF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CCRD - TMVWF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ZS - TMVWF
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
ASAN - TMVWF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
More