TNEYF
Price
$3.77
Change
-$0.06 (-1.57%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.87B
ZPTAF
Price
$4.78
Change
-$0.17 (-3.43%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
475.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

TNEYF vs ZPTAF

Header iconTNEYF vs ZPTAF Comparison
Open Charts TNEYF vs ZPTAFBanner chart's image
Tamarack Valley Energy
Price$3.77
Change-$0.06 (-1.57%)
Volume$87.82K
Capitalization1.87B
Surge Energy
Price$4.78
Change-$0.17 (-3.43%)
Volume$14.2K
Capitalization475.55M
TNEYF vs ZPTAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TNEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZPTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TNEYF vs. ZPTAF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TNEYF is a Hold and ZPTAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (TNEYF: $3.77 vs. ZPTAF: $4.78)
Brand notoriety: TNEYF and ZPTAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TNEYF: 385% vs. ZPTAF: 50%
Market capitalization -- TNEYF: $1.87B vs. ZPTAF: $475.55M
TNEYF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $1.87B. ZPTAF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $475.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $116.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TNEYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZPTAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • TNEYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZPTAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TNEYF is a better buy in the long-term than ZPTAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TNEYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZPTAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TNEYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ZPTAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both TNEYF and ZPTAF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

TNEYF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -3.93% price change this week, while ZPTAF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -6.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.25% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNEYF($1.87B) has a higher market cap than ZPTAF($476M). ZPTAF has higher P/E ratio than TNEYF: ZPTAF (11.99) vs TNEYF (10.82). ZPTAF YTD gains are higher at: 18.025 vs. TNEYF (13.093). TNEYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 983M vs. ZPTAF (302M). ZPTAF has more cash in the bank: 8.43M vs. TNEYF (2.76M). ZPTAF has less debt than TNEYF: ZPTAF (243M) vs TNEYF (748M). TNEYF has higher revenues than ZPTAF: TNEYF (1.74B) vs ZPTAF (635M).
TNEYFZPTAFTNEYF / ZPTAF
Capitalization1.87B476M393%
EBITDA983M302M325%
Gain YTD13.09318.02573%
P/E Ratio10.8211.9990%
Revenue1.74B635M274%
Total Cash2.76M8.43M33%
Total Debt748M243M308%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TNEYF vs ZPTAF: Fundamental Ratings
TNEYF
ZPTAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6252
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4471
SMR RATING
1..100
6478
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
885
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZPTAF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as TNEYF (32). This means that ZPTAF’s stock grew similarly to TNEYF’s over the last 12 months.

TNEYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPTAF (71). This means that TNEYF’s stock grew similarly to ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

TNEYF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPTAF (78). This means that TNEYF’s stock grew similarly to ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

TNEYF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPTAF (48). This means that TNEYF’s stock grew similarly to ZPTAF’s over the last 12 months.

ZPTAF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TNEYF (88). This means that ZPTAF’s stock grew significantly faster than TNEYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TNEYFZPTAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TNEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZPTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIKJX17.000.11
+0.64%
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Z
RYECX193.19N/A
N/A
Rydex Energy C
FVCSX34.91N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies C
AEURX9.00N/A
N/A
American Century Equity Income R
GMAWX23.34N/A
N/A
GMO Small Cap Quality III

TNEYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNEYF has been closely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TNEYF jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNEYF
1D Price
Change %
TNEYF100%
-1.54%
BTE - TNEYF
79%
Closely correlated
-3.54%
ZPTAF - TNEYF
77%
Closely correlated
-3.43%
CDDRF - TNEYF
73%
Closely correlated
-2.45%
VET - TNEYF
72%
Closely correlated
-2.67%
MTDR - TNEYF
71%
Closely correlated
-3.54%
More

ZPTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZPTAF has been closely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZPTAF jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZPTAF
1D Price
Change %
ZPTAF100%
-3.43%
BTE - ZPTAF
81%
Closely correlated
-3.54%
TNEYF - ZPTAF
79%
Closely correlated
-1.54%
VET - ZPTAF
77%
Closely correlated
-2.67%
OBE - ZPTAF
76%
Closely correlated
-3.31%
CRLFF - ZPTAF
76%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
More