TNL
Price
$47.81
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 1 closing price
107 days until earnings call
TUIFF
Price
$8.35
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Ad is loading...

TNL vs TUIFF

Header iconTNL vs TUIFF Comparison
Open Charts TNL vs TUIFFBanner chart's image
Travel + Leisure
Price$47.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.25K
CapitalizationN/A
TUI AG
Price$8.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
TNL vs TUIFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
TNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
TNL vs. TUIFF commentary
Nov 05, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TNL is a Buy and TUIFF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 05, 2024
Stock price -- (TNL: $49.11 vs. TUIFF: $8.35)
Brand notoriety: TNL and TUIFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TNL: 68% vs. TUIFF: 6%
Market capitalization -- TNL: $3.4B vs. TUIFF: $35.02B
TNL [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $3.4B. TUIFF’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $35.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $9.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TNL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTUIFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • TNL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TUIFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TNL is a better buy in the long-term than TUIFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TNL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TNL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

TNL (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а +1.24% price change this week, while TUIFF (@Other Consumer Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

TNL is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (-0.75% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TUIFF($35B) has a higher market cap than TNL($3.4B). TNL YTD gains are higher at: 26.517 vs. TUIFF (7.603). TUIFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. TNL (848M). TUIFF has higher revenues than TNL: TUIFF (17.9B) vs TNL (3.75B).
TNLTUIFFTNL / TUIFF
Capitalization3.4B35B10%
EBITDA848M1.34B63%
Gain YTD26.5177.603349%
P/E Ratio9.19N/A-
Revenue3.75B17.9B21%
Total Cash314MN/A-
Total Debt5.73BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TNL vs TUIFF: Fundamental Ratings
TNL
TUIFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61100
SMR RATING
1..100
417
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4340
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4384
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TNL's Valuation (11) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as TUIFF (30) in the null industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew similarly to TUIFF’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TUIFF (100) in the null industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew somewhat faster than TUIFF’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's SMR Rating (4) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as TUIFF (17) in the null industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew similarly to TUIFF’s over the last 12 months.

TUIFF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as TNL (43) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that TUIFF’s stock grew similarly to TNL’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TUIFF (84) in the null industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew somewhat faster than TUIFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TNL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
TNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBUY61.510.20
+0.32%
Amplify Online Retail ETF
VAMO29.66N/A
N/A
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
JMBS44.80N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Mortgage-Backed Sec ETF
HART31.82N/A
N/A
NYLI Healthy Hearts ETF
LONZ50.90N/A
N/A
PIMCO Sr Ln Actv ETF

TNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNL has been loosely correlated with SABR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TNL jumps, then SABR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNL
1D Price
Change %
TNL100%
N/A
SABR - TNL
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
CCL - TNL
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
ABNB - TNL
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSV - TNL
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
LIND - TNL
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
More

TUIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TUIFF and TRZBF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TUIFF and TRZBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TUIFF
1D Price
Change %
TUIFF100%
N/A
TRZBF - TUIFF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ROL - TUIFF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OOBHF - TUIFF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCL - TUIFF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
TNL - TUIFF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More