Advertisement
TOFB vs WHGRF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TOFB is a Hold and WHGRF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TOFB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWHGRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- TOFB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WHGRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TOFB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHGRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- TOFB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WHGRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
| TOFB | WHGRF | TOFB / WHGRF | |
| Capitalization | 3.61M | 13.3B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -466K | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.500 | 25.422 | -49% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 8.04 | - |
| Revenue | 8.2M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 609K | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 357K | N/A | - |
TOFB | WHGRF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 97 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 88 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 32 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WHGRF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TOFB (91). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew significantly faster than TOFB’s over the last 12 months.
WHGRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as TOFB (100). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew similarly to TOFB’s over the last 12 months.
WHGRF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as TOFB (96). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew similarly to TOFB’s over the last 12 months.
WHGRF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as TOFB (61). This means that WHGRF’s stock grew similarly to TOFB’s over the last 12 months.
TOFB's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WHGRF (93). This means that TOFB’s stock grew significantly faster than WHGRF’s over the last 12 months.
| TOFB | WHGRF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 46% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 58% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 74% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 38% |
Advertisement
TOFB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TOFB and TBLMF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TOFB and TBLMF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOFB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOFB | 100% | +2.65% | ||
| TBLMF - TOFB | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UVRBF - TOFB | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TATYY - TOFB | 7% Poorly correlated | +2.59% | ||
| WHGRF - TOFB | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UMEWF - TOFB | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
WHGRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WHGRF and UELKY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHGRF and UELKY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WHGRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHGRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| UELKY - WHGRF | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TBLMF - WHGRF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WHGLY - WHGRF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
| UVRBF - WHGRF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WLMIF - WHGRF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||