Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TQSAX vs VIMAX
TQSAX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts TQSAX vs VIMAX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq Adv
Price$24.75
Change+$0.29 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets847.66M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$358.38
Change-$0.51 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.16B
TQSAX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TQSAX vs. VIMAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TQSAX is a Buy and VIMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. TQSAX (848M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than TQSAX: VIMAX (1.47) vs TQSAX (0.34). TQSAX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: TQSAX (10 years) vs VIMAX (24 years). TQSAX (1.41) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). TQSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. VIMAX (16.00). TQSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMAX: TQSAX (2500) vs VIMAX (3000). VIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.04 vs. TQSAX (7.96). TQSAX (67.30) and VIMAX (65.04) have equivalent 5 years return.
| TQSAX | VIMAX | TQSAX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.05 | 2,280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 0.05 | 2,820% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.682 | 9.709 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 848M | 199B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 1.47 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.96 | 15.04 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.68 | 41.07 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.30 | 65.04 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 141.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement