Ad is loading...
TQSAX vs VIMAX
TQSAX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts TQSAX vs VIMAX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq Adv
Price$20.39
Change-$1.41 (-6.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets657.94M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$308.60
Change-$16.03 (-4.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets181.84B
TQSAX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TQSAX vs. VIMAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TQSAX is a Buy and VIMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 182B vs. TQSAX (658M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than TQSAX: VIMAX (1.59) vs TQSAX (0.38). TQSAX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: TQSAX (9 years) vs VIMAX (23 years). TQSAX (1.40) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). TQSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. VIMAX (13.00). TQSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMAX: TQSAX (2500) vs VIMAX (3000). VIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.65 vs. TQSAX (-3.59). VIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 113.24 vs. TQSAX (101.77).
| TQSAX | VIMAX | TQSAX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.05 | 2,280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.05 | 2,800% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.625 | -0.623 | 582% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 658M | 182B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 1.59 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.59 | 6.65 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.79 | 9.78 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.77 | 113.24 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 106.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...