Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TQSMX vs VIMAX
TQSMX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts TQSMX vs VIMAX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq
Price$23.73
Change+$0.19 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets759.5M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$358.77
Change+$2.72 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.45B
TQSMX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TQSMX vs. VIMAX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TQSMX is a Buy and VIMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 192B vs. TQSMX (760M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than TQSMX: VIMAX (1.52) vs TQSMX (0.55). TQSMX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: TQSMX (9 years) vs VIMAX (24 years). TQSMX (0.90) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). TQSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. VIMAX (16.00). TQSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMAX: TQSMX (2500) vs VIMAX (3000). VIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.02 vs. TQSMX (1.61). VIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 69.61 vs. TQSMX (64.66).
| TQSMX | VIMAX | TQSMX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.05 | 1,740% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.05 | 1,800% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.067 | 8.996 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 760M | 192B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.52 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.61 | 17.02 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.57 | 41.04 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.66 | 69.61 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 130.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement