Ad is loading...
TQSMX vs VIMAX
TQSMX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts TQSMX vs VIMAX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq
Price$20.89
Change+$0.44 (+2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets636.2M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$314.64
Change+$5.78 (+1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.23B
TQSMX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TQSMX vs. VIMAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TQSMX is a Buy and VIMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 175B vs. TQSMX (636M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than TQSMX: VIMAX (1.59) vs TQSMX (0.60). TQSMX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: TQSMX (9 years) vs VIMAX (23 years). TQSMX (0.96) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). TQSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. VIMAX (13.00). TQSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMAX: TQSMX (2500) vs VIMAX (3000). VIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.35 vs. TQSMX (-6.38). VIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 73.05 vs. TQSMX (65.96).
| TQSMX | VIMAX | TQSMX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.05 | 1,740% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.05 | 1,920% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.593 | -5.450 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 636M | 175B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.59 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.38 | 4.35 | -147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.45 | 10.23 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.96 | 73.05 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...