Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TQSMX vs VIMAX
TQSMX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts TQSMX vs VIMAX
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq
Price$23.65
Change+$0.16 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets750.53M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$351.59
Change+$2.07 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.28B
TQSMX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
TQSMX vs. VIMAX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TQSMX is a Buy and VIMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. TQSMX (751M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than TQSMX: VIMAX (1.52) vs TQSMX (0.55). TQSMX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: TQSMX (9 years) vs VIMAX (24 years). TQSMX (0.90) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). TQSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. VIMAX (16.00). TQSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMAX: TQSMX (2500) vs VIMAX (3000). VIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.95 vs. TQSMX (6.38). VIMAX (72.75) and TQSMX (69.91) have equivalent 5 years return.
| TQSMX | VIMAX | TQSMX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.05 | 1,740% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.05 | 1,800% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.846 | 6.997 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 751M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.52 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.38 | 16.95 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.08 | 42.29 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.91 | 72.75 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 126.21 | - |