TRC vs TUSK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TRC is a Hold and TUSK is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TRC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TUSK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- TRC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TUSK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
| TRC | TUSK | TRC / TUSK | |
| Capitalization | 413M | 177M | 233% |
| EBITDA | 1.11M | 67M | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -10.872 | -36.323 | 30% |
| P/E Ratio | 128.00 | 23.38 | 548% |
| Revenue | 44.7M | 309M | 14% |
| Total Cash | 64.5M | 16.6M | 389% |
| Total Debt | 47.9M | 63.3M | 76% |
TRC | TUSK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TUSK's Valuation (62) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as TRC (83) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that TUSK’s stock grew similarly to TRC’s over the last 12 months.
TUSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as TRC (100) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that TUSK’s stock grew similarly to TRC’s over the last 12 months.
TRC's SMR Rating (89) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as TUSK (97) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TRC’s stock grew similarly to TUSK’s over the last 12 months.
TRC's Price Growth Rating (74) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as TUSK (84) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TRC’s stock grew similarly to TUSK’s over the last 12 months.
TRC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as TUSK (5) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that TRC’s stock grew similarly to TUSK’s over the last 12 months.
| TRC | TUSK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 34% | 3 days ago 78% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UOPSX | 81.13 | 1.35 | +1.69% |
| ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Svc | |||
| FSOPX | 14.66 | 0.08 | +0.55% |
| Fidelity Series Small Cap Opps | |||
| CSCVX | 15.23 | 0.08 | +0.53% |
| CornerCap Small-Cap Value Advisor | |||
| FSSFX | 11.19 | 0.03 | +0.27% |
| Fidelity Advisor Series Small Cap | |||
| EEMDX | 7.83 | 0.01 | +0.13% |
| MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research R1 | |||
TRC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRC has been loosely correlated with MDU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRC jumps, then MDU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRC | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| MDU - TRC | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| IIIN - TRC | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| CODI - TRC | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| MATW - TRC | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| TUSK - TRC | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
More | ||||
TUSK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TUSK has been loosely correlated with CRESY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TUSK jumps, then CRESY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TUSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUSK | 100% | +0.71% | ||
| CRESY - TUSK | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| MLI - TUSK | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| TRC - TUSK | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| IIIN - TUSK | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.39% | ||
| MEC - TUSK | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.50% | ||
More | ||||