Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TRQZX vs WFDDX
TRQZX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts TRQZX vs WFDDX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$103.00
Change-$0.19 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.01B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$28.83
Change+$0.06 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets939.91M
TRQZX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. WFDDX (940M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: TRQZX (0.61) vs WFDDX (0.00). TRQZX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: TRQZX (5 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: TRQZX (0) vs WFDDX (1000000). WFDDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.03 vs. TRQZX (-4.77). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 4.49 vs. WFDDX (-29.45).
| TRQZX | WFDDX | TRQZX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.14 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.17 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.452 | 3.788 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28B | 940M | 2,979% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.77 | -1.03 | 462% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.36 | 19.03 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.49 | -29.45 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -9.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement