Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TRQZX vs WFDDX
TRQZX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts TRQZX vs WFDDX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$103.46
Change+$0.44 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$28.48
Change+$0.27 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets965.18M
TRQZX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. WFDDX (965M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: TRQZX (0.61) vs WFDDX (0.00). TRQZX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: TRQZX (5 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: TRQZX (0) vs WFDDX (1000000). WFDDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.93 vs. TRQZX (-0.43). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 11.26 vs. WFDDX (-22.14).
| TRQZX | WFDDX | TRQZX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.14 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.17 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.720 | 2.742 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28B | 965M | 2,902% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.43 | 2.93 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.37 | 33.27 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.26 | -22.14 | -51% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -18.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement