Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TRQZX vs WFDDX
TRQZX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts TRQZX vs WFDDX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$103.89
Change-$1.15 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.99B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$29.42
Change-$0.30 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets952.2M
TRQZX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. WFDDX (952M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: TRQZX (0.60) vs WFDDX (0.00). TRQZX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: TRQZX (6 years) vs WFDDX (21 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: TRQZX (0) vs WFDDX (1000000). WFDDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.12 vs. TRQZX (-3.30). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 0.53 vs. WFDDX (-32.70).
| TRQZX | WFDDX | TRQZX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.14 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.17 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.289 | 7.215 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27B | 952M | 2,836% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.30 | 1.12 | -294% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.52 | 38.81 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.53 | -32.70 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -8.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement