Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TRQZX vs WFDDX
TRQZX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts TRQZX vs WFDDX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$101.71
Change-$1.28 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.68B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$28.20
Change-$0.41 (-1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets948.11M
TRQZX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 27.7B vs. WFDDX (948M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: TRQZX (0.61) vs WFDDX (0.00). TRQZX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: TRQZX (5 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: TRQZX (0) vs WFDDX (1000000). WFDDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.21 vs. TRQZX (-2.76). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 5.73 vs. WFDDX (-26.73).
| TRQZX | WFDDX | TRQZX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.14 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.17 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.254 | 3.211 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.7B | 948M | 2,922% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.76 | 3.21 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.08 | 16.78 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.73 | -26.73 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -19.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement