Ad is loading...
TRQZX vs WFDDX
TRQZX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts TRQZX vs WFDDX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$90.12
Change-$4.80 (-5.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.39B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$23.80
Change-$1.66 (-6.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets907.23M
TRQZX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. WFDDX (907M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: TRQZX (0.66) vs WFDDX (0.00). TRQZX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: TRQZX (5 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.62). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: TRQZX (0) vs WFDDX (1000000). WFDDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.19 vs. TRQZX (-11.65). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 37.98 vs. WFDDX (2.95).
| TRQZX | WFDDX | TRQZX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.14 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.17 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.759 | -8.153 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 907M | 3,021% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.65 | -8.19 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.12 | -11.66 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.98 | 2.95 | 1,287% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -25.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers