Ad is loading...
TRQZX vs WFDRX
TRQZX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts TRQZX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$92.28
Change+$1.98 (+2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.74B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$28.62
Change+$0.86 (+3.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets857.32M
TRQZX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.7B vs. WFDRX (857M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: TRQZX (0.66) vs WFDRX (0.00). TRQZX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: TRQZX (5 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.62). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX (0) and WFDRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.29 vs. TRQZX (-12.66). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 12.53 vs. WFDRX (-14.72).
| TRQZX | WFDRX | TRQZX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.79 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.82 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.346 | -12.180 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.7B | 857M | 2,999% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.66 | -8.29 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.12 | -1.91 | 373% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.53 | -14.72 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -22.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers