Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TRQZX vs WFDRX
TRQZX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts TRQZX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$101.57
Change-$0.86 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.24B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$32.55
Change-$0.06 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets942.85M
TRQZX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. WFDRX (943M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: TRQZX (0.61) vs WFDRX (0.00). TRQZX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: TRQZX (5 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX (0) and WFDRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.26 vs. TRQZX (-1.19). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 3.79 vs. WFDRX (-24.74).
| TRQZX | WFDRX | TRQZX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.79 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.82 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.698 | 3.164 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.2B | 943M | 2,884% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.19 | 5.26 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.38 | 17.68 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.79 | -24.74 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -10.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement