Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TRQZX vs WFDRX
TRQZX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts TRQZX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$96.42
Change-$0.65 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.03B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$30.64
Change-$0.07 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets928.16M
TRQZX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. WFDRX (928M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: TRQZX (0.67) vs WFDRX (0.00). TRQZX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: TRQZX (5 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX (0) and WFDRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.89 vs. TRQZX (-8.87). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. WFDRX (-16.96).
| TRQZX | WFDRX | TRQZX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.79 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.82 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.574 | -3.005 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27B | 928M | 2,909% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.87 | -3.89 | 228% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.73 | 27.75 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.69 | -16.96 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -15.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers