Ad is loading...
TRQZX vs WFDRX
TRQZX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts TRQZX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$90.12
Change-$4.80 (-5.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.39B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$27.16
Change-$1.90 (-6.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets907.23M
TRQZX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. WFDRX (907M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: TRQZX (0.66) vs WFDRX (0.00). TRQZX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: TRQZX (5 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.62). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX (0) and WFDRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.92 vs. TRQZX (-11.65). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 37.98 vs. WFDRX (9.33).
| TRQZX | WFDRX | TRQZX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.79 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.82 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.759 | -8.067 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 907M | 3,021% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.65 | -6.92 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.12 | -9.78 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.98 | 9.33 | 407% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -17.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...