Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TRQZX vs WFDRX
TRQZX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts TRQZX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$99.02
Change-$1.43 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.18B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$31.04
Change-$0.51 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets932.62M
TRQZX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. WFDRX (933M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: TRQZX (0.64) vs WFDRX (0.00). TRQZX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: TRQZX (5 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX (0) and WFDRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.10 vs. TRQZX (-4.77). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 10.71 vs. WFDRX (-15.81).
| TRQZX | WFDRX | TRQZX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.79 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.82 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.688 | -1.803 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.2B | 933M | 2,915% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.77 | 0.10 | -4,934% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.95 | 37.16 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.71 | -15.81 | -68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -14.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers