Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
TRQZX vs WFDRX
TRQZX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts TRQZX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$103.46
Change+$0.44 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$32.54
Change+$0.31 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets965.18M
TRQZX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. WFDRX (965M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: TRQZX (0.61) vs WFDRX (0.00). TRQZX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: TRQZX (5 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX (0) and WFDRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.33 vs. TRQZX (-0.43). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 11.26 vs. WFDRX (-17.31).
| TRQZX | WFDRX | TRQZX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.79 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.82 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.720 | 2.942 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28B | 965M | 2,902% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.43 | 4.33 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.37 | 36.21 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.26 | -17.31 | -65% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -9.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement