TRRPF
Price
$0.44
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
16.51M
URNAF
Price
$5.44
Change
-$0.01 (-0.18%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
222.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

TRRPF vs URNAF

Header iconTRRPF vs URNAF Comparison
Open Charts TRRPF vs URNAFBanner chart's image
Torrent Cap
Price$0.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization16.51M
Urbana
Price$5.44
Change-$0.01 (-0.18%)
Volume$1.65K
Capitalization222.43M
TRRPF vs URNAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TRRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
URNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TRRPF vs. URNAF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TRRPF is a Buy and URNAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (TRRPF: $0.44 vs. URNAF: $5.44)
Brand notoriety: TRRPF and URNAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TRRPF: 41% vs. URNAF: 121%
Market capitalization -- TRRPF: $16.51M vs. URNAF: $222.43M
TRRPF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.51M. URNAF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $222.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TRRPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileURNAF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • TRRPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • URNAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, URNAF is a better buy in the long-term than TRRPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TRRPF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while URNAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TRRPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • URNAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both TRRPF and URNAF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

TRRPF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while URNAF (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.00% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
URNAF($222M) has a higher market cap than TRRPF($16.5M). URNAF (3.90) and TRRPF (3.83) have similar P/E ratio . URNAF YTD gains are higher at: 38.772 vs. TRRPF (-1.689). URNAF has higher revenues than TRRPF: URNAF (92.8M) vs TRRPF (1.1M).
TRRPFURNAFTRRPF / URNAF
Capitalization16.5M222M7%
EBITDA4.45MN/A-
Gain YTD-1.68938.772-4%
P/E Ratio3.833.9098%
Revenue1.1M92.8M1%
Total Cash28.5MN/A-
Total DebtN/A14.9M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TRRPF vs URNAF: Fundamental Ratings
TRRPF
URNAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4189
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1003
SMR RATING
1..100
4849
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9810
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

URNAF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRRPF (79). This means that URNAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRRPF’s over the last 12 months.

URNAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRRPF (100). This means that URNAF’s stock grew significantly faster than TRRPF’s over the last 12 months.

TRRPF's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as URNAF (49). This means that TRRPF’s stock grew similarly to URNAF’s over the last 12 months.

URNAF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as TRRPF (56). This means that URNAF’s stock grew similarly to TRRPF’s over the last 12 months.

URNAF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRRPF (98). This means that URNAF’s stock grew significantly faster than TRRPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TRRPFURNAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TRRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
URNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLEMX44.69N/A
N/A
Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Advisor
MDEFX22.14N/A
N/A
BlackRock International Select Eq Inv A
GISYX17.99N/A
N/A
Grandeur Peak Intl Stalwarts Instl
KAUIX6.60N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Kaufmann IS
HRIIX15.63N/A
N/A
Hood River International Opportunity Inv

TRRPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRRPF has been loosely correlated with IOOFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRRPF jumps, then IOOFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRRPF
1D Price
Change %
TRRPF100%
N/A
IOOFF - TRRPF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TGOPY - TRRPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
URNAF - TRRPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
UBAAF - TRRPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-10.57%
WNDLF - TRRPF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
More