It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TSIOF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileYUEIY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TSIOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUEIY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
TSIOF (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а -0.32% price change this week, while YUEIY (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was +2.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.75%.
Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
TSIOF | YUEIY | TSIOF / YUEIY | |
Capitalization | 1.69B | 2.83B | 60% |
EBITDA | 1.45B | 1.02B | 143% |
Gain YTD | 59.542 | -9.547 | -624% |
P/E Ratio | 9.48 | 7.64 | 124% |
Revenue | 9.25B | 8.18B | 113% |
Total Cash | 5.01B | 923M | 543% |
Total Debt | 331M | 970M | 34% |
TSIOF | YUEIY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
YUEIY's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as TSIOF (10). This means that YUEIY’s stock grew similarly to TSIOF’s over the last 12 months.
TSIOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YUEIY (62). This means that TSIOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than YUEIY’s over the last 12 months.
TSIOF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YUEIY (84). This means that TSIOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than YUEIY’s over the last 12 months.
TSIOF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as YUEIY (44). This means that TSIOF’s stock grew similarly to YUEIY’s over the last 12 months.
TSIOF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as YUEIY (38). This means that TSIOF’s stock grew similarly to YUEIY’s over the last 12 months.
TSIOF | YUEIY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago32% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago36% | 4 days ago67% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago47% | 4 days ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago37% | 4 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago28% | 4 days ago67% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago23% | 4 days ago69% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago63% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago27% | 4 days ago60% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago41% | 4 days ago75% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that TSIOF and TALN have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSIOF and TALN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TSIOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TSIOF | 100% | N/A | ||
TALN - TSIOF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
VDEVF - TSIOF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
USYNF - TSIOF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MKKOF - TSIOF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TSIHF - TSIOF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that YUEIY and YUEIF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YUEIY and YUEIF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YUEIY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
YUEIY | 100% | +1.69% | ||
YUEIF - YUEIY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TSIOF - YUEIY | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
USYNF - YUEIY | -3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WACLY - YUEIY | -7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MKKOF - YUEIY | -7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |